Suppr超能文献

优先事项设定和跨国学习:TO-REACH 对初级保健的相关性。

Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL) and Utrecht University, Departments of Sociology and Human Geography, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Jul 22;23:e40. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000287.

Abstract

AIM

To inform the primary care community about priorities for research in primary care as came up from the European project TO-REACH and to discuss transferability of service and policy innovations between countries.

BACKGROUND

TO-REACH stands for ransfer of rganizational innovations for esilient, ffective, equitable, ccessible, sustainable and omprehensive ealth services and systems. This EU-funded project has put health systems and services research higher on the European agenda and has led to the current development of a European 'Partnership Transforming Health and Care Systems'.

METHODS

To identify research priorities, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used. Policy documents and strategic roadmaps were searched, and priorities were mapped. Stakeholders were involved through national roundtable consultations and online consultations. Regarding transferability, we carried out a review of the literature, guided by a conceptual framework, and using a snowballing approach.

FINDINGS

Primary care emerged as an important priority from the inventory, as are areas that are conducive to strengthening primary care, such as workforce policies. The large variation in service organisation and policy around primary care in Europe is a huge potential for cross-country learning. However, the simple transfer of primary care service and policy arrangements from one health system to another has a big chance to fail, unless known conditions for successful transfer are taken into account and gaps in our knowledge about transfer are resolved.

摘要

目的

向初级保健社区通报初级保健研究的优先事项,这些优先事项来自欧洲项目 TO-REACH,并讨论国家间服务和政策创新的可转移性。

背景

TO-REACH 代表转移组织创新以实现有弹性、有效、公平、可及、可持续和综合的卫生服务和系统。这个由欧盟资助的项目将卫生系统和服务研究提上了欧洲议程的更高位置,并导致了当前欧洲“转型健康和护理系统伙伴关系”的发展。

方法

为了确定研究优先事项,使用了定性和定量方法。搜索了政策文件和战略路线图,并对优先事项进行了映射。通过国家圆桌会议协商和在线协商让利益攸关方参与进来。关于可转移性,我们根据一个概念框架,采用滚雪球的方法,对文献进行了综述。

结果

初级保健是从清单中确定的一个重要优先事项,还有一些有利于加强初级保健的领域,如劳动力政策。欧洲初级保健服务和政策组织的巨大差异是跨国学习的巨大潜力。然而,除非考虑到成功转移的已知条件,并解决我们关于转移的知识差距,否则将初级保健服务和政策安排从一个卫生系统简单地转移到另一个卫生系统很有可能会失败。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b144/9309752/7f611104f9f7/S1463423622000287_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Priority setting and cross-country learning: the relevance of TO-REACH for primary care.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022 Jul 22;23:e40. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000287.
2
European priorities for research on health care organizations and service delivery.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:16-26. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011040.
3
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
7
Designing a framework for primary health care research in Canada: a scoping literature review.
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0839-x.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators.
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Oct 27;11:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Quick adaptation of the organisation of general practices during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Aug 31;24(Suppl 1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02114-5.

本文引用的文献

2
Integrating primary care and public health to enhance response to a pandemic.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Jun 10;22:e27. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000311.
3
Out-of-hours primary care in 26 European countries: an overview of organizational models.
Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 28;37(6):744-750. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa064.
5
Integrating rural health care.
Aust J Rural Health. 2017 Feb;25(1):4. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12350.
6
Health workforce planning in Europe: Creating learning country clusters.
Health Policy. 2015 Dec;119(12):1537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
8
The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e742-50. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X674422.
9
Health systems and policy research in Europe: Horizon 2020.
Lancet. 2013 Aug 24;382(9893):668-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62195-3. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
Analyzing European health systems: Europe as a research laboratory.
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Apr;23(2):185-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt032. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验