Center for Population Health Research, School of Public and Community Health Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2023 Mar;29(3):366-375. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0191. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
Although many emergency departments (EDs) receive telehealth services for psychiatry, or telepsychiatry, to manage acute psychiatric emergencies, national research on the usage of ED telepsychiatry is limited. To investigate ED telepsychiatry usage in the pre-COVID-19 era, we surveyed a sample of EDs receiving telepsychiatry in 2019, as a follow-up to a survey targeted to similar EDs in 2017. All U.S. EDs open in 2019 ( = 5,563) were surveyed to characterize emergency care. A more in-depth second survey on telepsychiatry use (2019 ED Telepsychiatry Survey) was then sent to 235 EDs. Of these EDs, 130 were randomly selected from those that reported telepsychiatry receipt in 2019, and 105 were selected based on their participation in a similar survey in 2017 (2017 ED Telepsychiatry Survey). Of the 235 EDs receiving the 2019 Telepsychiatry Survey, 192 (82%) responded and 172 (90% of responding EDs) confirmed 2019 telepsychiatry receipt. Of these, five were excluded for missing data (analytic sample = 167). Telepsychiatry was the only form of emergency psychiatric services for 92 (55%) EDs. The most common usage of telepsychiatry was for admission or discharge decisions (82%) and transfer coordination (70%). The most commonly reported telepsychiatry mental health consultants were psychiatrists or other physician-level mental health professionals (74%). With telepsychiatry as the only form of psychiatric services for most telepsychiatry-receiving EDs, this innovation fills a critical gap in access to emergency psychiatric care. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on usage of ED telepsychiatry.
尽管许多急诊科(ED)提供远程医疗服务以管理急性精神科急症,但有关 ED 远程精神病学使用的国家研究有限。为了调查 COVID-19 之前 ED 远程精神病学的使用情况,我们对 2019 年接受远程精神病学服务的 ED 进行了抽样调查,这是对 2017 年类似 ED 进行调查的后续调查。所有 2019 年开放的美国 ED( = 5563)都接受了紧急护理调查。然后,向 235 家 ED 发送了第二份关于远程精神病学使用情况的更深入调查(2019 年 ED 远程精神病学调查)。这些 ED 中有 130 家是从 2019 年报告接受远程精神病学服务的 ED 中随机选择的,另外 105 家是根据他们在 2017 年参加类似调查(2017 年 ED 远程精神病学调查)选择的。在收到 2019 年远程精神病学调查的 235 家 ED 中,有 192 家(82%)做出了回应,有 172 家(做出回应的 ED 的 90%)确认在 2019 年收到了远程精神病学服务。其中 5 家因数据缺失被排除在外(分析样本 = 167)。远程精神病学是 92 家(55%)ED 的唯一形式的紧急精神科服务。远程精神病学最常用的用途是用于入院或出院决策(82%)和转院协调(70%)。报告的最常见远程精神病学心理健康顾问是精神科医生或其他医师级别的心理健康专业人员(74%)。对于大多数接受远程精神病学服务的 ED 来说,远程精神病学是唯一形式的精神科服务,这一创新填补了紧急精神科护理获取方面的一个关键空白。需要进一步研究 COVID-19 大流行对 ED 远程精神病学使用的影响。