ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e215902. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5902.
Psychiatric emergency department (ED) visits may be avoidable if individuals have access to adequate outpatient care, but the extent to which individuals use the ED itself as a key point of access is largely unknown.
To describe the extent to which the ED is a first point of contact for mental health care among adults, and identify key factors associated with this outcome.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted from 2010 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. Using health care administrative data, all individuals aged 16 years and older with an incident psychiatric ED visit were included. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2019 to February 2021.
The primary outcome was no outpatient mental health or addictions contact in the 2 years preceding the incident ED visit. The study also measured predisposing (age, sex, immigrant status, comorbidity), enabling (neighborhood income, rurality, continuity of primary care), and need factors (diagnosis from incident ED visit) associated with the so-called first-contact ED visits, generating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs.
The cohort included 659 084 patients who visited the ED. Among these patients, 340 354 were female individuals (51.6%), and the mean (SD) age was 39.1 (18.5) years. The incident ED visit was a first contact for 298 924 individuals (45.4%). Patients who had increased odds of first-contact ED visits included older individuals (aged 65-84 years vs 16-24 years; aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.12-1.14), male individuals (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.15), immigrants (eg, economic class immigrant vs nonimmigrant status: aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.18-1.21), rural residents (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.21), and in those with minimal primary care (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.67-1.69). All diagnoses had a higher likelihood of first-contact ED visits than mood disorders, particularly substance and alcohol use disorders (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.65-1.68).
This study's results suggest that nearly half of incident psychiatric ED visits were first-contact visits, which may be avoidable. Targeted efforts to improve outpatient access should focus on populations with risk factors for first-contact ED presentations, including men, older adults, rural residents, those with poor primary care connectivity, and those with substance-related diagnoses.
如果个人能够获得足够的门诊护理,精神科急诊(ED)就诊可能是可以避免的,但个人将 ED 用作主要就诊途径的程度在很大程度上尚不清楚。
描述成年人中 ED 作为精神卫生保健的首要就诊途径的程度,并确定与这种结果相关的关键因素。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究于 2010 年至 2018 年在加拿大安大略省进行。使用医疗保健管理数据,纳入所有有精神科 ED 就诊的年龄在 16 岁及以上的个体。统计分析于 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 2 月进行。
主要结局是在 ED 事件发生前的 2 年内没有接受门诊精神卫生或成瘾治疗。该研究还测量了与所谓的首次接触 ED 就诊相关的倾向因素(年龄、性别、移民身份、合并症)、促成因素(邻里收入、农村地区、初级保健连续性)和需要因素(ED 就诊的诊断),生成调整后的优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
该队列包括 659084 名就诊 ED 的患者。这些患者中,340354 人为女性(51.6%),平均(SD)年龄为 39.1(18.5)岁。298924 名患者的 ED 就诊为首次就诊(45.4%)。首次接触 ED 就诊可能性更高的患者包括年龄较大的患者(65-84 岁比 16-24 岁;aOR,1.13;95%CI,1.12-1.14)、男性(aOR,1.14;95%CI,1.13-1.15)、移民(例如,经济类移民比非移民身份:aOR,1.20;95%CI,1.18-1.21)、农村居民(aOR,1.21;95%CI,1.20-1.21)和初级保健服务最少的患者(aOR,1.68;95%CI,1.67-1.69)。所有诊断的首次接触 ED 就诊的可能性均高于心境障碍,特别是物质和酒精使用障碍(aOR,1.66;95%CI,1.65-1.68)。
本研究结果表明,近一半的精神科 ED 就诊是首次就诊,这种就诊可能是可以避免的。有针对性地努力改善门诊服务应侧重于存在首次接触 ED 就诊风险因素的人群,包括男性、老年人、农村居民、初级保健联系较差的人群和有物质相关诊断的人群。