• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[人工耳蜗——当前问题]

[Cochlear implant--current questions].

作者信息

Burian K, Eisenwort B, Klasek O

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987 Mar;66(3):119-23.

PMID:3586792
Abstract

Basing on the results obtained with 63 patients stimulated via the extracochlear or intracochlear version of the Vienna Cochlea Implant the following topics are discussed: Extracochlear versus intracochlear stimulation. Cochlea Implants in small children. Preoperative signs regarding the final result. Ideas for evaluation of results. Extracochlear or intracochlear stimulation enables speech understanding in about one-half of the postlingual deaf patients but the extent of speech recognition is greater when intracochlearly stimulated. Long-term follow-up as well as our experience with patients who had to be reimplanted demonstrate that the implantation manoevre does not create clinically relevant signs of damage. After the experiences with cochlear implants in adults their use in small children was encouraged, the more so since electric stimulation of prelingual deaf adults does not mediate speech recognition. There seems to be a chance to achieve speech comprehension if electric stimulation starts very early. The age limit in our group is the end of the third year. Final results cannot be presented but it is very clear that acoustic orientation and verbalisation are created and enhanced by electric stimulation. With regard to the preoperative prognosis, three parameters (threshold, dynamic range and TDL) are valid, of which TDL seems to be of major importance. The evaluation of the results should follow the hierarchical organisation of the language and must consider the three main levels of speech organisation.

摘要

基于对63例通过维也纳人工耳蜗的耳外或耳内植入方式进行刺激的患者所获得的结果,讨论了以下主题:耳外刺激与耳内刺激;小儿人工耳蜗植入;关于最终结果的术前体征;结果评估思路。耳外或耳内刺激能使约一半的语后聋患者理解言语,但耳内刺激时言语识别程度更高。长期随访以及我们对不得不再次植入患者的经验表明,植入操作不会产生临床相关的损伤迹象。在有了成人人工耳蜗植入的经验后,鼓励在小儿中使用人工耳蜗,尤其是因为对语前聋成人的电刺激不能介导言语识别。如果电刺激非常早开始,似乎有机会实现言语理解。我们组的年龄限制是三岁末。虽然不能给出最终结果,但很明显电刺激能产生并增强听觉定向和言语表达。关于术前预后,三个参数(阈值、动态范围和TDL)是有效的,其中TDL似乎最为重要。结果评估应遵循语言的层次结构,且必须考虑言语组织的三个主要层面。

相似文献

1
[Cochlear implant--current questions].[人工耳蜗——当前问题]
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987 Mar;66(3):119-23.
2
[Experiences with the Vienna auditory prosthesis].
Laryngorhinootologie. 1989 Feb;68(2):95-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998293.
3
Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.使用序贯双侧人工耳蜗的儿童的感知益处和功能结果。
Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):470-82. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc194.
4
The Vienna cochlear implant program.维也纳人工耳蜗植入项目。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1986 May;19(2):313-28.
5
The Vienna Cochlear Implant in patients with obliteration of the cochlea.
Laryngoscope. 1994 Jan;104(1 Pt 1):79-82. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199401000-00013.
6
[Psychophysical data and speech comprehension after 2 years with the Clark/Nucleus prosthesis].[使用克拉克/核子人工耳蜗2年后的心理物理学数据与言语理解能力]
HNO. 1988 May;36(5):188-92.
7
The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.远程麦克风技术对成人人工耳蜗植入者的益处。
Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):590-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb70.
8
Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.一组接受多通道人工耳蜗植入的儿童的十年随访
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):615-28. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000281802.59444.02.
9
Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.成人双侧人工耳蜗植入后的主观和客观结果。
Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):313-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bd7e6.
10
[Prognostic indications within the scope of the selection of cochlear implant patients].[人工耳蜗植入患者选择范围内的预后指标]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1989 Apr;68(4):221-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-998322.