述评：将生活经验、临床和研究专业知识结合起来——对 2022 年 5 月辩论（CAMH 专业人员是否应该在青少年时期诊断人格障碍？）的述评。
Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise - a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?).
机构信息
Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Shipley, UK.
出版信息
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2022 Sep;27(3):246-249. doi: 10.1111/camh.12586. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
BACKGROUND
There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives.
METHOD
We bring together lived experience, clinical and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence.
RESULTS
We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives.
CONCLUSIONS
We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives and ideas.
背景
有大量证据表明，边缘型人格障碍（BPD，或类似的情绪不稳定人格障碍，EUPD）的概念是有害的。我们对五月辩论特刊中表达的观点进行了评论，重点强调了关注的问题和替代方案。
方法
我们汇集了来自生活经历、临床和研究方面的专业知识。这篇评论是在综合利用所有这些证据来源的基础上共同撰写的。
结果
我们概述了边缘型人格障碍的概念无效、有害、对有效治疗并非必要，以及可能阻碍替代方案的发展和评估的证据。
结论
我们要求读者考虑这些关注问题、观点和想法。
Zotero 插件