Hospital Medicine, UnityPoint Health Clinic Quad Cities, Rock Island, Illinois, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2022 Oct 3;35(10):852-857. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac088.
Hypertensive crisis is a life-threatening condition, further classified as hypertensive emergency and hypertensive urgency based on the presence or absence of acute or progressive end-organ damage, respectively. Readmissions in hypertensive emergency have been studied before. We aimed to analyze 30-day readmissions using recent data and more specific ICD-10-CM coding in patients with hypertensive crisis.
In a retrospective study using the National Readmission Database 2018, we collected data on 129,239 patients admitted with the principal diagnosis of hypertensive crisis. The primary outcome was the all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were common causes of readmission, in-hospital mortality, resource utilization, and independent predictors of readmission. We also compared outcomes between patients with hypertensive urgency and hypertensive emergency.
Among 128,942 patients discharged alive, 13,768 (10.68%) were readmitted within 30 days; the most common cause of readmission was hypertensive crisis (19%). In-hospital mortality for readmissions (1.5%) was higher than for index admissions (0.2%, P < 0.01). Mean length of stay for readmissions was 4.5 days. The mean hospital cost associated with readmissions was $10,950, and total hospital costs were $151 million. Age <65 years and female sex were independent predictors of higher readmission rates. Subgroup analysis revealed a higher readmission rate for hypertensive emergency than hypertensive urgency (11.7% vs. 10%, P < 0.01).
All-cause 30-day readmission rates are high in patients admitted with hypertensive crisis, especially patients with hypertensive emergency. Higher in-hospital mortality and resource utilization are associated with readmission in these patients.
高血压危象是一种危及生命的病症,根据是否存在急性或进行性靶器官损伤,进一步分为高血压急症和高血压亚急症。高血压急症的再入院情况之前已有研究。我们旨在利用最近的数据和更具体的 ICD-10-CM 编码分析高血压危象患者的 30 天再入院情况。
我们在一项回顾性研究中,使用 2018 年国家再入院数据库,收集了 129239 例以高血压危象为主要诊断入院的患者数据。主要结局是全因 30 天再入院率。次要结局是再入院的常见原因、住院期间死亡率、资源利用情况以及再入院的独立预测因素。我们还比较了高血压亚急症和高血压急症患者的结局。
在 128942 例存活出院的患者中,13768 例(10.68%)在 30 天内再次入院;再入院的最常见原因是高血压危象(19%)。再入院的院内死亡率(1.5%)高于首次入院(0.2%,P<0.01)。再入院的平均住院时间为 4.5 天。再入院相关的平均医院费用为 10950 美元,总医院费用为 1.51 亿美元。年龄<65 岁和女性是再入院率较高的独立预测因素。亚组分析显示,高血压急症患者的再入院率高于高血压亚急症患者(11.7% vs. 10%,P<0.01)。
高血压危象患者的全因 30 天再入院率较高,尤其是高血压急症患者。这些患者的再入院与更高的院内死亡率和资源利用有关。