• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高住院患者出院小结的质量。

Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.

机构信息

Whittington Health NHS Trust, Whittington Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(S1):S63-S67. doi: 10.3233/JRS-227026.

DOI:10.3233/JRS-227026
PMID:35871370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9844071/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discharge summaries (DCS) are vital in facilitating handover to community colleagues. Unfortunately, at Whittington Health, General Practitioners (GPs) found it difficult to identify relevant information in DCS, and use of medical jargon meant patients did not understand details of their admission. With this quality improvement project, the team aimed to improve DCS to enhance patient-centered care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to improve the quality of DCS by critiquing the ones produced within our trust and implementing various interventions.

METHODS

Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were completed. A multi-disciplinary meeting was conducted to identify the needs of each party in a DCS. A new template was subsequently launched. Teaching was conducted and educational leaflets were disseminated hospital-wide. Quality of written communication was audited quarterly, and evaluated against quality indicators. Problems with DCS were identified via GP and patient feedback, and these became the focus of subsequent PDSA cycles.

RESULTS

From March 2019 to February 2020, all the audited categories improved, with an overall improvement from 67% to 92%. We also received positive feedback from GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of DCS can be improved with appropriate interventions, leading to improved patient care. A similar PDSA cycle could be utilized elsewhere to achieve similar results.

摘要

背景

出院小结(Discharge summaries,DCS)对于向社区同事交接至关重要。遗憾的是,惠廷顿卫生保健中心(Whittington Health)的全科医生(General Practitioners,GPs)发现难以从 DCS 中识别相关信息,而医学术语的使用则导致患者无法理解其入院细节。在这个质量改进项目中,团队旨在改进 DCS 以增强以患者为中心的护理。

目的

该质量改进项目(quality improvement project,QIP)的目的是通过对我们信托机构内生成的 DCS 进行审查并实施各种干预措施,来提高 DCS 的质量。

方法

完成了多个计划-执行-研究-行动(Plan-Do-Study-Act,PDSA)循环。召开了一次多学科会议,以确定 DCS 各方的需求。随后推出了一个新模板。在全院范围内进行了教学并发放了教育传单。每季度对书面沟通质量进行审核,并根据质量指标进行评估。通过全科医生和患者的反馈,发现了 DCS 存在的问题,这些问题成为后续 PDSA 循环的重点。

结果

从 2019 年 3 月到 2020 年 2 月,所有审核类别均有所改善,总体从 67%提高到 92%。我们还收到了全科医生的积极反馈。

结论

通过适当的干预措施,可以提高 DCS 的质量,从而改善患者的护理。在其他地方也可以使用类似的 PDSA 循环来取得类似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ac/9844071/159040ca7393/jrs-33-jrs227026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ac/9844071/159040ca7393/jrs-33-jrs227026-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44ac/9844071/159040ca7393/jrs-33-jrs227026-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.提高住院患者出院小结的质量。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(S1):S63-S67. doi: 10.3233/JRS-227026.
2
Improving the quality and content of discharge summaries on acute medicine wards: a quality improvement project.提高急性医学病房出院小结的质量和内容:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Apr;11(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001780.
3
Improving the Quality and Completeness of Discharge Summaries at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan: A Quality Improvement Project.提高巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院出院小结的质量和完整性:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 14;16(3):e56134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56134. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Matched comparison of GP and consultant rating of electronic discharge summaries.门急诊电子病历质量的 GP 和顾问匹配评价比较。
Health Inf Manag. 2010;39(3):7-15. doi: 10.1177/183335831003900302.
5
What makes a "successful" or "unsuccessful" discharge letter? Hospital clinician and General Practitioner assessments of the quality of discharge letters.什么样的出院小结算是“成功”或“不成功”?医院临床医生和全科医生对出院小结质量的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06345-z.
6
Improving the quality of discharge summaries: implementing updated Academy of Medical Royal Colleges standards at a district general hospital.提高出院小结质量:在一家区综合医院实施医学皇家学院更新后的标准
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 May 15;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207268.w2918. eCollection 2015.
7
Evaluation of communication to general practitioners when opioid-naïve post-surgical patients are discharged from hospital on opioids.评估阿片类药物初治术后患者出院带阿片类药物时与全科医生的沟通情况。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jun;90(6):1019-1024. doi: 10.1111/ans.15903. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Discharge documentation improvement project: a pilot study.出院文件改进项目:一项试点研究。
Intern Med J. 2015 Dec;45(12):1280-5. doi: 10.1111/imj.12895.
9
Learning from Lean: a quality improvement project using a Lean-based improvement approach to improve discharge for patients with frailty in an acute care hospital.从精益中学习:一个使用基于精益的改进方法来改善急性护理医院虚弱患者出院的质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Nov;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001393.
10
The quality of communication between hospitals and general practitioners: an assessment.医院与全科医生之间的沟通质量:一项评估。
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Dec;18(4):241-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1998.00281.x.

引用本文的文献

1
What influences preparations of discharge documentation at patient discharge? An interview study with hospital health professionals based on the theoretical domains framework.患者出院时,哪些因素会影响出院文件的准备工作?一项基于理论领域框架对医院卫生专业人员进行的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):e090753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090753.
2
What do readers need? Qualitative requirements of medical discharge summaries from the recipients' perspective.读者需要什么?从接收者角度看医学出院小结的定性要求。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 14;83(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01582-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the quality of discharge summaries through a direct feedback system.通过直接反馈系统提高出院小结的质量。
Future Healthc J. 2020 Jun;7(2):149-154. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2019-0046.
2
Elderly at risk in care transitions When discharge summaries are poorly transferred and used -a descriptive study.护理转接过程中面临风险的老年人:出院小结传递与使用不佳时的描述性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3581-0.
3
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.出院待随访检验结果的干预措施系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
Assessing Origins of Quality Gaps in Discharge Summaries: A Survey of Resident Physician Attitudes.评估出院小结质量差距的根源:住院医师态度调查
J Biomed Educ. 2015;2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/341759.
5
Association of discharge summary quality with readmission risk for patients hospitalized with heart failure exacerbation.心力衰竭加重住院患者出院小结质量与再入院风险的关联
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):109-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001476. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
6
A hospital discharge summary quality improvement program featuring individual and team-based feedback and academic detailing.医院出院总结质量改进计划,以个人和团队为基础的反馈和学术细化为特色。
Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jun;347(6):472-7. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000171.
7
A structured workshop to improve the quality of resident discharge summaries.一个旨在提高住院医师出院小结质量的结构化研讨会。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Mar;4(1):87-91. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00249.1.