Suppr超能文献

读者需要什么?从接收者角度看医学出院小结的定性要求。

What do readers need? Qualitative requirements of medical discharge summaries from the recipients' perspective.

作者信息

Unnewehr Markus, Siemen Leonie, Friederichs Hendrik, Windisch Wolfram, Zawy Alsofy Samer, Schaaf Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred- Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58448, Witten, Germany.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Sleep Medicine, Allergology, St. Barbara-Klinik, Am Heessener Wald 1, 59073, Hamm, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 14;83(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01582-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discharge summaries (DSs) are the primary communication tools in clinical medicine. The transfer of information and plans is essential to ensure consistent patient safety and continuity of care. Therefore, DSs play a key role in population health. However, the overall quality of DSs is considered deficient, and there is a notable lack of scientific knowledge and research in this field, particularly regarding the needs of physicians as the primary recipients of DSs and key providers of ongoing patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore their requirements concerning the content, structure, and processing of DSs.

METHODS

A total of 159 outpatient primary care physicians (general practitioners, GPs) and specialists who refer patients to hospitals for various conditions were contacted across Germany using mixed sampling methods combining convenience, quota, and theory-driven sampling. Of these, 106 (66.67%) participated in telephone interviews. The interviews included nine open-ended questions, analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis, and a 43-item questionnaire, evaluated quantitatively with descriptive statistical methods to assess DS characteristics.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis revealed that recipients rated the prompt arrival of DSs, a clear treatment and diagnostic plan, and a coherent rationale as the most important requirements. The least important elements were newsletter-style content, patient contact information, patient ethnicity, and hospital logos or awards. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses identified similar priorities and challenges in DS content and structure. Sending a diagnosis list was considered a top priority by all physicians. While GPs placed high importance on diagnoses, treatment plans, and medication changes, specialists prioritized a logical line of reasoning.

CONCLUSION

This recipient-focused study highlighted specific areas for improvement in the content, structure, and delivery of DSs. Tailoring DS formats to the distinct needs of GPs and specialists has the potential to enhance their overall quality and utility. Ultimately, optimizing DSs may strengthen population health outcomes by improving care transitions, reducing adverse events, and supporting effective outpatient management across the healthcare system.

摘要

背景

出院小结(DSs)是临床医学中的主要沟通工具。信息和计划的传递对于确保患者安全的一致性和护理的连续性至关重要。因此,出院小结在人群健康中发挥着关键作用。然而,出院小结的整体质量被认为存在缺陷,并且该领域缺乏科学知识和研究,特别是关于作为出院小结的主要接收者和持续患者护理的关键提供者的医生的需求。本研究的目的是探讨他们对出院小结的内容、结构和处理的要求。

方法

采用便利抽样、配额抽样和理论驱动抽样相结合的混合抽样方法,联系了德国各地共159名门诊初级保健医生(全科医生,GPs)以及因各种病症将患者转诊至医院的专科医生。其中,106人(66.67%)参与了电话访谈。访谈包括九个开放式问题,采用梅林的定性内容分析法进行分析,以及一份包含43个条目的问卷,用描述性统计方法进行定量评估以评估出院小结的特征。

结果

定量分析显示,接收者将出院小结的及时送达、清晰的治疗和诊断计划以及连贯的理由列为最重要的要求。最不重要的元素是时事通讯式内容、患者联系信息、患者种族以及医院标志或奖项。定量和定性分析都确定了出院小结内容和结构方面类似的优先事项和挑战。发送诊断清单被所有医生视为首要任务。虽然全科医生高度重视诊断、治疗计划和药物变化,但专科医生则优先考虑逻辑推理思路。

结论

这项以接收者为中心的研究突出了出院小结在内容、结构和传递方面需要改进的特定领域。根据全科医生和专科医生的不同需求定制出院小结格式有可能提高其整体质量和实用性。最终,优化出院小结可能通过改善护理过渡、减少不良事件以及支持整个医疗系统有效的门诊管理来加强人群健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe91/11995522/30693efc4a19/13690_2025_1582_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验