School of Health Care Administration, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Australasian College of Paramedicine, Australia.
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 25;12:05028. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05028.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been shown to cause enormous psychological burden among health care workers, including first responders. However, psychological well-being of first responders, essential in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic, has often been ignored. We performed the first meta-analysis to explore the prevalence of 1) depression, 2) anxiety, and 3) stress among first responders for medical emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychInfo, PubMed, and the WHO COVID-19 database from 2020. The Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation model in R-software determined the pooled prevalence and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis for associated factors of depression, anxiety, and stress with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Cochrane Q, τ, and I statistics were used to examine heterogeneity. Sub-group analysis was conducted to identify moderator variables.
We identified 765 records, from which 17 studies were included with 8096 first responders. The pooled prevalence was 31% (95% CI = 21%-41%) for depression; 67% (95% CI = 64%-70%) for mild depression, 24% (95% CI = 17%-31%) for moderate depression, and 16% (95% CI = 4%-34%) for severe depression. The pooled prevalence for anxiety was 32% (95% CI = 20%-44%); 60% (95% CI = 46%-73%) for mild anxiety, 27% (95% CI = 14%-42%) for moderate anxiety, and 14% (95% CI = 7%-22%) for severe anxiety. The pooled prevalence for stress was 17% (95% CI = 4%-34%); 58% (95% CI = 38%-77%) for mild stress, 22% (95% CI = 5%-44%) for moderate stress, and 19% (95% CI = 5%-37%) for severe stress. The prevalence of depression was 37% (95% CI = 25%-52%) for paramedics, 28% (95% CI = 12%-54%) for EMS personnel and 22% (95% CI = 13%-33%) for police. Similarly, the prevalence of anxiety was 38% (95% CI = 20%-60%) for paramedics, 28% (95% CI = 11%-53%) for EMS personnel, and 19% (95% CI = 10%-32%) for police. Married responders were likely at risk for depression (1.50, 95% CI = 1.26-1.78) and anxiety (1.94, 95% CI = 1.62-2.33), while unmarried responders were less likely at risk for depression (0.67, 95% CI = 0.56-0.79) and anxiety (0.50, 95% CI = 0.43-0.63).
High prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic among first responders for medical emergencies emphasizes the need for monitoring their psychological well-being. Early assessment and management of mild depression, anxiety, and stress among first responders are crucial in preventing progression into moderate and severe types.
COVID-19 大流行已对医护人员造成了巨大的心理负担,包括一线急救人员。然而,在抗击 COVID-19 大流行中,一线急救人员的心理健康经常被忽视。我们进行了首次荟萃分析,以探索 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗急救一线急救人员中 1)抑郁、2)焦虑和 3)压力的流行率。
从 2020 年开始,我们在 Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、PsychInfo、PubMed 和世卫组织 COVID-19 数据库中进行了全面检索。R 软件中的 Freeman-Tukey 双弧形正弦变换模型确定了抑郁、焦虑和压力的合并流行率以及相关因素的综合荟萃分析,对应的 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Cochrane Q、τ 和 I 统计量来评估异质性。进行亚组分析以确定调节变量。
我们从 765 条记录中确定了 17 项研究,其中包括 8096 名一线急救人员。抑郁的合并流行率为 31%(95% CI=21%-41%);轻度抑郁为 67%(95% CI=64%-70%),中度抑郁为 24%(95% CI=17%-31%),重度抑郁为 16%(95% CI=4%-34%)。焦虑的合并流行率为 32%(95% CI=20%-44%);轻度焦虑为 60%(95% CI=46%-73%),中度焦虑为 27%(95% CI=14%-42%),重度焦虑为 14%(95% CI=7%-22%)。压力的合并流行率为 17%(95% CI=4%-34%);轻度压力为 58%(95% CI=38%-77%),中度压力为 22%(95% CI=5%-44%),重度压力为 19%(95% CI=5%-37%)。在急救人员中,抑郁的患病率为 37%(95% CI=25%-52%),在 EMS 人员中为 28%(95% CI=12%-54%),在警察中为 22%(95% CI=13%-33%)。同样,焦虑的患病率在急救人员中为 38%(95% CI=20%-60%),在 EMS 人员中为 28%(95% CI=11%-53%),在警察中为 19%(95% CI=10%-32%)。已婚急救人员可能面临抑郁(1.50,95% CI=1.26-1.78)和焦虑(1.94,95% CI=1.62-2.33)的风险,而未婚急救人员患抑郁(0.67,95% CI=0.56-0.79)和焦虑(0.50,95% CI=0.43-0.63)的风险较低。
COVID-19 大流行期间,一线急救人员在处理医疗急救时出现了较高的抑郁、焦虑和压力,这强调了监测他们心理健康的必要性。早期评估和管理一线急救人员的轻度抑郁、焦虑和压力对于防止其发展为中度和重度至关重要。