• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国能源部国防核设施中利益相关者的演变及风险沟通的结构描述:历史视角、主要利益相关者及外部事件

A structural description of the evolution of stakeholders and risk communication in the Department of Energy's defense nuclear facilities: Historical perspective, major stakeholders, and external events.

作者信息

Krahn Steven L

机构信息

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Consortium for Risk Evaluation with Stakeholder Participation (CRESP), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2421-2439. doi: 10.1111/risa.13986. Epub 2022 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13986
PMID:35871635
Abstract

Regulators and policymakers are routinely challenged with explaining complex concepts concerning risk. Part of the challenge is helping external and internal stakeholders to understand the context behind risk-related information and decisions. This paper will describe the historical evolution of the safety and regulatory framework for an important category in the nuclear industry-defense nuclear facilities owned and operated by the US Department of Energy. In parallel with describing this evolution, three major events which occurred external to the complex of defense nuclear facilities will be summarized, and their impact on the maturation of the Department's safety and regulatory framework will be discussed. Finally, integrated with these two threads of discussion will be a chronicle of the changing set of involved organizations and the expanding set of external stakeholders involved in risk decisions-and therefore, the risk communications ecosystem surrounding defense nuclear facilities. It will be noted that this system was once describable as a classic "iron triangle," but now has progressed to a complex network of federal and state organizations, numerous congressional committees, and expanding sets of external stakeholders. It is hoped that a comprehensive discussion of the context of risk assessment in the defense nuclear facilities complex-addressing historical insights, organizational evolution, and the maturing structure of regulation-will provide enhanced opportunities for building trust and understanding in this complex environment.

摘要

监管机构和政策制定者经常面临解释与风险相关的复杂概念的挑战。挑战的一部分在于帮助外部和内部利益相关者理解风险相关信息和决策背后的背景。本文将描述核工业中一个重要类别——美国能源部拥有和运营的国防核设施的安全与监管框架的历史演变。在描述这一演变的同时,将总结在国防核设施建筑群外部发生的三件重大事件,并讨论它们对该部门安全与监管框架成熟度的影响。最后,将这两条讨论线索结合起来的将是一份关于参与风险决策的相关组织不断变化的情况以及参与国防核设施风险决策的外部利益相关者群体不断扩大的记录——因此,也就是围绕国防核设施的风险沟通生态系统。需要指出的是,这个系统曾经可以被描述为一个经典的“铁三角”,但现在已经发展成为一个由联邦和州组织、众多国会委员会以及不断扩大的外部利益相关者群体组成的复杂网络。希望对国防核设施建筑群中风险评估背景的全面讨论——涉及历史见解、组织演变和监管的成熟结构——将为在这个复杂环境中建立信任和理解提供更多机会。

相似文献

1
A structural description of the evolution of stakeholders and risk communication in the Department of Energy's defense nuclear facilities: Historical perspective, major stakeholders, and external events.美国能源部国防核设施中利益相关者的演变及风险沟通的结构描述:历史视角、主要利益相关者及外部事件
Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2421-2439. doi: 10.1111/risa.13986. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
2
The dynamic nature of risk in DOE facilities in the surveillance and maintenance program-with observations for risk communications.能源部设施监测与维护计划中风险的动态特性——关于风险沟通的观察结果
Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2400-2407. doi: 10.1111/risa.14028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.一种利用能源部汉福德基地的两个案例研究来评估生态资源与风险的方法。
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):357-372. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0798-8. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
Collaboration versus communication: The Department of Energy's Amchitka Island and the Aleut Community.合作与沟通:美国能源部的阿姆奇特卡岛与阿留申社区
Environ Res. 2009 May;109(4):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
9
Industry challenge to best practice risk communication.行业对最佳实践风险沟通的挑战。
J Food Sci. 2012 Apr;77(4):R111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02630.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.污染退役设施中生态资源风险评估:方法学及美国能源部汉福德场址案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 20;190(8):478. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6866-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Sliding scales for assessing and communicating human and ecological risks and complexities for restoration, remediation crises, and decisions.用于评估和传达人类与生态风险以及恢复、补救危机和决策的复杂性的滑动量表。
J Risk Res. 2024;27(1):108-123. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2023.2299829. Epub 2024 Jan 17.