• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给等待名单中等待时间最短的候选人额外加分配额,可改善美国肝脏移植中性别差异导致的可及性问题。

Awarding additional MELD points to the shortest waitlist candidates improves sex disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2912-2920. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17159. Epub 2022 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.17159
PMID:35871752
Abstract

Since the introduction of the MELD-based allocation system, women are now 30% less likely than men to undergo liver transplant (LT) and have 20% higher waitlist mortality. These disparities are in large part due to height differences in men and women though no national policies have been implemented to reduce sex disparities. Patients were identified using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) from 2014 to 2019. Patients were categorized into five groups by first dividing into thirds by height then dividing the shortest third into three groups to capture more granular differences in the most disadvantaged patients (<166 cm). We then used LSAM to model waitlist outcomes in five versions of awarding additional MELD points to shorter candidates compared to current policy. We identified two proposed policy changes LSAM scenarios that resulted in improvement in LT and death percentage for the shortest candidates with the least negative impact on taller candidates. In conclusion, awarding an additional 1-2 MELD points to the shortest 8% of LT candidates would improve waitlist outcomes for women. This strategy should be considered in national policy allocation to address sex-based disparities in LT.

摘要

自 MELD 为基础的分配系统引入以来,女性接受肝移植 (LT) 的可能性比男性低 30%,而在等待名单上的死亡率则高 20%。这些差异在很大程度上归因于男女身高的差异,尽管没有实施任何国家政策来减少性别差异。

患者是通过 2014 年至 2019 年的科学移植受者登记处 (SRTR) 确定的。患者首先按身高分为三分之一,然后将最短的三分之一分为三组,以捕捉最弱势患者(<166cm)更细微的差异。然后,我们使用 LSAM 在与当前政策相比为更矮小的候选人额外增加 1-2 个 MELD 点的五个版本中,对等待名单的结果进行建模。我们确定了两种拟议的政策变化 LSAM 情景,这些情景导致对最短候选人的 LT 和死亡百分比有所改善,而对更高候选人的负面影响最小。

总之,为最短的 8%LT 候选人额外增加 1-2 个 MELD 点将改善女性的等待名单结果。在国家政策分配中,应考虑这一策略,以解决 LT 中的性别差异问题。

相似文献

1
Awarding additional MELD points to the shortest waitlist candidates improves sex disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States.给等待名单中等待时间最短的候选人额外加分配额,可改善美国肝脏移植中性别差异导致的可及性问题。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2912-2920. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17159. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
2
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
3
Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Candidates with High MELD and Severe Hepatic Encephalopathy.高 MELD 评分和严重肝性脑病的肝移植候选者的候补名单结局。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5032-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
4
MELD is MELD is MELD? Transplant center-level variation in waitlist mortality for candidates with the same biological MELD.MELD 就是 MELD 吗?对于具有相同生物学 MELD 的候选者,移植中心在等待名单死亡率方面存在差异。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3305-3311. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16603. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Association of Body Surface Area With Access to Deceased Donor Liver Transplant and Novel Allocation Policies.体表面积与获取已故供体肝移植和新分配政策的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):610-616. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0191.
6
Correcting the sex disparity in MELD-Na.纠正终末期肝病模型-血清钠(MELD-Na)中的性别差异。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3296-3304. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16731. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease exception policy and outcomes in pediatric patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome requiring liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型/小儿终末期肝病例外政策和需要肝移植的肝肺综合征小儿患者的结局。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Feb 1;29(2):134-144. doi: 10.1002/lt.26548. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
8
A Share 21 model in liver transplantation: Impact on waitlist outcomes.肝移植中的A Share 21模型:对等待名单结果的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Aug;20(8):2184-2197. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15836. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
9
Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.女性接受肝移植的机会减少:身高、MELD 例外评分和肾功能低估的作用。
Transplantation. 2018 Oct;102(10):1710-1716. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002196.
10
Validating a novel score based on interaction between ACLF grade and MELD score to predict waitlist mortality.验证一种基于 ACLF 分级与 MELD 评分相互作用的新型评分,以预测等待移植患者的死亡率。
J Hepatol. 2021 Jun;74(6):1355-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.12.003. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-based Differences and Comparative Predictive Value of MELD 3.0 in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Waitlist Outcomes After Standardization of Listing Criteria in the United States.美国肝脏移植标准统一后,肝肾联合移植等待名单结果中基于性别的差异及MELD 3.0的比较预测价值
Transplant Direct. 2025 Apr 9;11(5):e1781. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001781. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Model of Urgency for Liver Transplantation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Practical Model to Prioritize Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma on the Liver Transplant Waitlist.肝细胞癌肝移植紧迫性模型:一种在肝移植等待名单上对肝细胞癌患者进行优先排序的实用模型。
Gastroenterology. 2025 Apr;168(4):784-794.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.015. Epub 2024 Nov 30.
3
Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States.不一致的值和算法公平性:美国器官分配优先级系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x.
4
Sex and Size Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.性别和大小差异在获得肝移植治疗肝细胞癌患者的机会。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3498.
5
Evaluating the Correlation Between Anteroposterior Diameter, Body Surface Area, and Height for Liver Transplant Donors and Recipients.评估肝移植供体和受体的前后径、体表面积与身高之间的相关性。
Transplant Direct. 2024 May 16;10(6):e1630. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001630. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Availability of living donor optimizes timing of liver transplant in high-risk waitlisted cirrhosis patients.活体供者的可用性优化了高危等待肝移植肝硬化患者的手术时机。
Aging (Albany NY). 2023 Sep 2;15(17):8594-8612. doi: 10.18632/aging.204982.
7
Equity in liver transplantation: are we any closer?肝移植中的公平性:我们更接近目标了吗?
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2023 Aug 1;28(4):259-264. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000001085. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Sex- and age-based comparison of serum immunoglobulins following liver transplantation.肝移植后血清免疫球蛋白的性别和年龄比较。
Transpl Immunol. 2023 Jun;78:101826. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101826. Epub 2023 Mar 17.