• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎间盘突出症微创椎间盘切除术患者的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数评分的可接受症状状态的确定:一项随机对照试验的 2 年随访数据。

Determination of Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Oswestry Disability Index Score in Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: 2-Year Follow-up Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Spine Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e53-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.067. Epub 2022 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.067
PMID:35872131
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aim to determinate the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score in patients undergoing minimally invasive discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of prospectively collected, 2-year follow-up data was conducted. The anchor for determination of PASS was the European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scales question, and the Pearson correlation test was performed to evaluate its validity. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the PASS thresholds for ODI and its discriminative ability assessment. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out for alternative definition of PASS, different follow-up periods, and different subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 222 patients (92.1%) completed the 2-year follow-up, 92.8% of whom considered their state to be acceptable. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) were all >0.8, indicating a high discriminative ability. The PASS threshold for the ODI was suggested to be 5 at 6 months (AUC: 0.80; sensitivity: 79.0%, specificity: 73.7%) and 2 years (AUC: 0.98; sensitivity: 90.3%, specificity: 100%) postoperatively. Despite some variations found in different body mass index and baseline ODI subgroups, sensitivity analysis showed that the above-mentioned threshold was robust.

CONCLUSIONS

An ODI of 5 was noted to be the PASS threshold for patients received minimally invasive discectomy for the treatment of LDH. This ODI threshold was robust, and therefore recommended as the ultimate goal of minimally invasive treatment for LDH, which can help to present results of clinical research at an individual level.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定接受微创椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者的 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评分的可接受症状状态(PASS)。

方法

对前瞻性收集的 2 年随访数据进行了事后分析。PASS 的确定基准是欧洲生活质量视觉模拟量表问题,采用 Pearson 相关检验评估其有效性。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定 ODI 的 PASS 阈值及其判别能力评估。还对 PASS 的替代定义、不同随访时间和不同亚组进行了敏感性分析。

结果

共有 222 名患者(92.1%)完成了 2 年随访,其中 92.8%的患者认为自己的状态是可以接受的。ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)均>0.8,表明具有较高的判别能力。建议 ODI 的 PASS 阈值为术后 6 个月时为 5(AUC:0.80;敏感性:79.0%,特异性:73.7%)和 2 年(AUC:0.98;敏感性:90.3%,特异性:100%)。尽管在不同的体重指数和基线 ODI 亚组中发现了一些差异,但敏感性分析表明上述阈值是稳健的。

结论

接受微创椎间盘切除术治疗 LDH 的患者,ODI 为 5 被认为是 PASS 阈值。该 ODI 阈值是稳健的,因此建议作为微创治疗 LDH 的最终目标,可以帮助在个体水平上呈现临床研究结果。

相似文献

1
Determination of Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Oswestry Disability Index Score in Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: 2-Year Follow-up Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial.腰椎间盘突出症微创椎间盘切除术患者的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数评分的可接受症状状态的确定:一项随机对照试验的 2 年随访数据。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e53-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.067. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
The patient acceptable symptom state for the Oswestry Disability Index following single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症单节段腰椎融合术后 Oswestry 功能障碍指数的可接受症状状态。
Spine J. 2021 Apr;21(4):598-609. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
4
Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: Two-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究:两年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):493-503. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003314.
5
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy and Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Surgical Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study with a Minimum of 2 Years' Follow-Up.经皮椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内镜椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项至少 2 年随访的多中心回顾性队列研究。
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(1):E117-E125.
7
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.经皮椎间孔镜下微创全内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效与安全性的对比研究(ENDO-F 试验):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验方案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 28;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03052-1.
9
Correlation between Disc Imaging Observations and Clinical Efficacy after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A 1-Year Follow-up Study.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗后椎间盘影像学观察与临床疗效的相关性:一项为期 1 年的随访研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Apr;16(4):851-863. doi: 10.1111/os.14013. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
10
Evaluation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study.经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效评价:一项回顾性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):599-607. doi: 10.1111/os.12839. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the reported outcome scale for patients with lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者报告结局量表的研制与验证
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2524088. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2524088. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
2
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: an efficacy analysis.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Mar 15;16(3):829-837. doi: 10.62347/UWID7065. eCollection 2024.
3
Values derived from patient reported outcomes in spine surgery: a systematic review of the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state.
脊柱外科患者报告结局评估值:最小临床重要差异、显著临床获益和患者可接受症状状态的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Oct;32(10):3333-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07896-x. Epub 2023 Aug 29.