Suppr超能文献

用直接口服抗凝剂替代华法林用于结直肠内镜黏膜切除术的潜力:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。

Potential for replacing warfarin with a direct oral anticoagulant for endoscopic mucosal resection in the colorectum: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Yamada Takuya, Kuwai Toshio, Sasaki Yoshihiro, Sakakibara Yuko, Uraoka Toshio, Kato Motohiko, Watanabe Noriko, Kimura Toshihisa, Kada Akiko, Saito Akiko M, Harada Naohiko

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital Osaka Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology Osaka Rosai Hospital Osaka Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2022 Feb 21;2(1):e102. doi: 10.1002/deo2.102. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban replacement (AR) as an alternative to heparin bridging (HB) in patients taking warfarin and scheduled for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the colorectum.

METHODS

This trial was conducted at seven institutes in Japan between May 2016 and May 2018. Enrolled patients had been taking oral warfarin and were diagnosed within 3 months with colorectal polyps for which EMR was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive HB or AR. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, therapeutic endoscopy outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The planned sample size was 160 patients, but due to a decrease in the number of patients taking warfarin, the target number of cases could not be achieved within the case enrollment period, 44 cases were enrolled. They were divided into HB and AR groups. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 15% (3/20) in HB and 0% in AR (P = 0.199). The total number of postoperative bleeding events was five in HB and none in AR. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in AR than in HB (median: 3.0 vs. 13.5 days, < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events and no cerebral infarction/systemic embolism events.

CONCLUSION

AR for colorectal EMR may prove safe and has the potential to shorten hospital stay and reduce medical costs, though we were unable to evaluate the primary endpoint due to insufficient sample size.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估阿哌沙班替代疗法(AR)作为华法林桥接疗法(HB)的替代方案,用于接受华法林治疗且计划进行结直肠内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

本试验于2016年5月至2018年5月在日本的7家机构进行。入选患者一直在口服华法林,且在3个月内被诊断为有指征进行EMR的结直肠息肉。患者被随机分配接受HB或AR。主要终点是术后出血的发生率。次要终点是住院时间、治疗性内镜检查结果和不良事件。

结果

计划样本量为160例患者,但由于服用华法林的患者数量减少,在病例入组期内未达到目标病例数,共入组44例。他们被分为HB组和AR组。HB组术后出血发生率为15%(3/20),AR组为0%(P = 0.199)。HB组术后出血事件总数为5例,AR组为0例。AR组的住院时间明显短于HB组(中位数:3.0天对13.5天,<0.001)。没有严重不良事件,也没有脑梗死/全身性栓塞事件。

结论

结直肠EMR的AR可能是安全的,并且有可能缩短住院时间和降低医疗成本,尽管由于样本量不足我们无法评估主要终点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2ef/9302298/b34d65cab60e/DEO2-2-e102-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验