Braddock Kurt, Schumann Sandy, Corner Emily, Gill Paul
School of Communication, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 8;13:779836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779836. eCollection 2022.
Terrorism researchers have long discussed the role of psychology in the radicalization process. This work has included research on the respective roles of individual psychological traits and responses to terrorist propaganda. Unfortunately, much of this work has looked at psychological traits and responses to propaganda individually and has not considered how these factors may interact. This study redresses this gap in the literature. In this experiment ( = 268), participants were measured in terms of their narcissism, Machiavellianism, subclinical psychopathy, and everyday sadism-collectively called the Dark Tetrad. Participants were then exposed to a vivid or nonvivid terrorist narrative (or a control message). Results indicate that Machiavellianism interacts with both narrative exposure and narrative vividness to amplify the persuasive effect of terrorist narratives. Neither narcissism, subclinical psychopathy, nor everyday sadism had such an effect. These results highlight the importance of considering the psychological traits of audiences when evaluating proclivity for radicalization persuasion by terrorist narratives.
长期以来,恐怖主义研究者一直在探讨心理学在激进化过程中的作用。这项工作包括对个体心理特征以及对恐怖主义宣传的反应各自所起作用的研究。遗憾的是,这项工作大多是分别考察心理特征和对宣传的反应,而没有考虑这些因素可能如何相互作用。本研究弥补了文献中的这一空白。在这个实验中(N = 268),对参与者的自恋、马基雅维利主义、亚临床精神病态和日常施虐倾向进行了测量,这些统称为黑暗三性格。然后让参与者接触生动或不生动的恐怖主义叙事(或一条对照信息)。结果表明,马基雅维利主义与叙事接触及叙事生动性相互作用,放大了恐怖主义叙事的说服效果。自恋、亚临床精神病态和日常施虐倾向均未产生这种效果。这些结果凸显了在评估恐怖主义叙事导致激进化说服的倾向时考虑受众心理特征的重要性。