Liu Haotian, Zhang Hongliang, Zhang Chao, Liao Zhichao, Li Ting, Yang Tielong, Zhang Gengpu, Yang Jilong
Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 7;12:890040. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.890040. eCollection 2022.
The rarity and complexity of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) make it a challenge to determine the incidence, survival, and metastasis rates. In addition, the clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis have rarely been reported.
Data on patients diagnosed with STS in the SEER database from 2000 to 2018 were extracted by SEER*Stat 8.3.9.1, and the incidence trend was calculated by Joinpoint 4.9 software. The KM method was used to calculate the survival curve, and the log-rank method was used to compare differences in the survival curves. The clinicopathological risk factors for lymph node metastasis were screened by logistic regression.
Among the 35987 patients, 4299 patients (11.9%) had distant metastasis. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 6.02%, which included patients suffering from both lymph node and distant metastasis. Considering that some lymph node metastases might be accompanying events of distant metastasis, the rate of only lymph node metastasis in STS patients decreased to 3.42% after excluding patients with distant metastasis. Patients with only lymph node metastases (N1/2M0) had a significantly worse prognosis than those without metastases (N0M0) but a better prognosis than those with only distant metastases (N0M1) (p<0.0001). In the multivariate logistic analysis, STS patients with larger tumors located in the head and neck, viscera, retroperitoneum, and certain specific pathological subtypes (compared with the liposarcoma), such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, synovial sarcoma, and angiosarcoma, had a higher risk of lymph node metastasis.
Lymph node metastasis is rare in STS, and the metastasis rate is significantly different among the different pathological types. Tumor size, location, and pathological subtype are significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastasis. The overall survival of patients with lymph node metastasis is better than that of patients with distant metastasis, which suggests a more precise prognosis evaluation should be performed in these AJCC stage IV STS patients.
软组织肉瘤(STS)的罕见性和复杂性使得确定其发病率、生存率和转移率具有挑战性。此外,关于淋巴结转移的临床病理危险因素鲜有报道。
使用SEER*Stat 8.3.9.1软件从2000年至2018年SEER数据库中提取诊断为STS的患者数据,并通过Joinpoint 4.9软件计算发病率趋势。采用KM法计算生存曲线,并用log-rank法比较生存曲线的差异。通过逻辑回归筛选淋巴结转移的临床病理危险因素。
在35987例患者中,4299例(11.9%)发生远处转移。总体淋巴结转移率为6.02%,其中包括同时发生淋巴结和远处转移的患者。考虑到一些淋巴结转移可能是远处转移的伴随事件,排除远处转移患者后,STS患者仅发生淋巴结转移的比例降至3.42%。仅发生淋巴结转移(N1/2M0)的患者预后明显差于无转移患者(N0M0),但优于仅发生远处转移的患者(N0M1)(p<0.0001)。在多因素逻辑分析中,肿瘤位于头颈部、内脏、腹膜后以及某些特定病理亚型(与脂肪肉瘤相比)的STS患者,如未分化多形性肉瘤、横纹肌肉瘤、子宫内膜间质肉瘤、胃肠道间质瘤、滑膜肉瘤和血管肉瘤,发生淋巴结转移的风险较高。
STS中淋巴结转移少见,不同病理类型的转移率差异显著。肿瘤大小、位置和病理亚型与淋巴结转移风险显著相关。淋巴结转移患者的总生存率优于远处转移患者,这表明应对这些美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)IV期STS患者进行更精确的预后评估。