Lisanti Christopher J, Lisanti Samuel E
Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, USUHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Linacre Q. 2022 Aug;89(3):257-274. doi: 10.1177/00243639211059270. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
Consumer medicine consists of medical interventions pursued for non-health-related goals with the locus of the goals residing solely with the patient. Currently, contraceptives, abortion, cosmetic procedures, and physician-assisted suicide (PAS)/euthanasia fall in this category. Consumer medicine originates from the fusion of expressive individualism with its sole focus on the subjective psychological well-being intersecting with an expansion of health now including well-being combined with an exaltation of autonomy. Expressive individualism is inward-focused and entirely subjective reducing the human to a psychologic self while instrumentalizing the biological and social dimensions and neglecting the spiritual dimension. Expressive individualism is currently manifested through economic activity (career and consumption) and particularly sexual expression. This contrasts with the holistic biopsychosocial-spiritual model of health with its deep inter-relationships and prioritization of the spiritual. Consumer medicine has damaged the profession of medicine. Physicians now have conflicting roles of healer versus body engineer, and conflicting obligations to do no harm while performing medical harms unrelated to objective health. There is now division within medicine and increasing external state regulations both seriously harming its professional status. The traditional teleologically driven ethical framework that is objectively disease-focused is now confused with a subjective list of non-health-related values as goals for medical interventions leading to an incoherent ethical framework. Biologic solutions best address biological problems and do not effectively address psychological, social, or even spiritual problems but rather make them worse. Medicine now reinforces and is complicit with expressive individualism and its attendant shallow and narrow understanding of what it means to be human with the current valuation of sexual expression and economic activity. Medical harms and social costs have resulted while challenging the value of those who are disabled, elderly, or marginalized. This shallow view has likely fueled the current existential crisis contributing to the marked increase in PAS/euthanasia in the West. Consumer medicine currently includes contraceptives, abortion, cosmetic procedures, and physician-assisted suicide (PAS)/euthanasia. These medical interventions are pursued for subjective non-health-related goals as opposed to the traditional goal of treating sick patients for their objective health. Consumer medicine's origins lie in the intersection of expressive individualism, the exaltation of patient autonomy combined with health's redefinition as subjective well-being. This has resulted in harms to the profession of medicine, ethical incoherence, and medical injury. Consumer medicine promotes a truncated understanding of the human at odds with the biopsychosocial-spiritual model and human flourishing. This has likely contributed to the rise of PAS/euthanasia.
消费医学包括为非健康相关目标而进行的医疗干预,这些目标完全在于患者自身。目前,避孕药、堕胎、整容手术以及医生协助自杀(PAS)/安乐死都属于这一范畴。消费医学源于表现主义个人主义的融合,其仅关注主观心理幸福感,与健康概念的扩展(现在包括幸福感)以及对自主性的推崇相交织。表现主义个人主义以自我为中心且完全主观,将人简化为心理自我,同时将生物和社会维度工具化,而忽视了精神维度。表现主义个人主义目前通过经济活动(职业和消费),特别是性表达得以体现。这与健康的整体生物心理社会 - 精神模型形成对比,后者具有深刻的内在联系且重视精神层面。消费医学损害了医学职业。医生现在扮演着治疗者与身体工程师的冲突角色,并且在实施与客观健康无关的医疗伤害时,承担着不造成伤害的冲突义务。医学内部现在出现了分歧,外部国家监管也日益增加,这两者都严重损害了其专业地位。传统的以疾病为客观导向的目的论伦理框架,现在与一系列作为医疗干预目标的非健康相关主观价值观相混淆,导致了伦理框架的不一致。生物解决方案最适合解决生物学问题,但无法有效解决心理、社会甚至精神问题,反而会使这些问题恶化。医学现在强化并参与了表现主义个人主义及其对人性的浅薄和狭隘理解,这种理解以当前对性表达和经济活动的重视为特征。这导致了医疗伤害和社会成本的产生,同时也对残疾、老年或边缘化人群的价值提出了挑战。这种浅薄的观点可能助长了当前的生存危机,导致西方PAS/安乐死显著增加。消费医学目前包括避孕药、堕胎、整容手术以及医生协助自杀(PAS)/安乐死。这些医疗干预是为了主观的非健康相关目标,而不是传统的为了患者的客观健康治疗疾病的目标。消费医学的起源在于表现主义个人主义的交汇,对患者自主性的推崇以及将健康重新定义为主观幸福感。这导致了对医学职业的损害、伦理的不一致以及医疗伤害。消费医学促进了对人的片面理解,这与生物心理社会 - 精神模型以及人类的繁荣发展相悖。这可能促成了PAS/安乐死的兴起。