School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Dent Res. 2022 Dec;101(13):1572-1579. doi: 10.1177/00220345221108699. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
Direct posterior dental restorations are commonly provided following management of dental caries. Amalgam use has been phased down and the feasibility of a phase-out by 2030 is being explored. Alternative direct restorative materials differ in their outcomes and provision. This research aimed to elicit the UK population's preferences for different attributes of restorations and their willingness to pay (WTP) for restorative services and outcomes. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was designed with patient and public involvement and distributed to a representative sample of the UK general population using an online survey. Respondents answered 17 choice tasks between pairs of scenarios that varied in levels of 7 attributes (wait for filling, clinician type, filling color, length of procedure, likely discomfort after filling, average life span of filling, and cost). An opt-out (no treatment) was included. Mixed logit models were used for data analysis. Marginal WTP for attribute levels and relative attribute importance were calculated. In total, 1,002 respondents completed the DCE. Overall, respondents were willing to pay £39.52 to reduce a 6-wk wait for treatment to 2 wk, £13.55 to have treatment by a dentist rather than a therapist, £41.66 to change filling color from silvery/gray to white, £0.27 per minute of reduced treatment time, £116.52 to move from persistent to no postoperative pain, and £5.44 per year of increased restoration longevity. Ability to pay affected willingness to pay, with low-income respondents more likely to opt out of treatment and value restoration color (white) and increased longevity significantly lower than those with higher income. Clinicians should understand potential drivers of restoration choice, so they can be discussed with individual patients to obtain consent. It is important that policy makers consider general population preferences for restorative outcomes and services, with an awareness of how income affects these, when considering the potential phase-out of amalgam restorations.
直接的后牙修复通常是在治疗龋齿后提供的。汞合金的使用已经逐渐减少,目前正在探索到 2030 年逐步淘汰的可行性。替代的直接修复材料在其结果和提供方面有所不同。本研究旨在了解英国民众对不同修复体属性的偏好以及他们对修复服务和结果的支付意愿 (WTP)。一项离散选择实验 (DCE) 是在患者和公众参与的基础上设计的,并通过在线调查分发给英国普通人群的代表性样本。受访者回答了 17 个选择任务,这些任务在 7 个属性的水平之间进行了配对(等待填充、临床医生类型、填充颜色、程序长度、填充后可能的不适、填充的平均寿命和成本)。包括一个选择退出(不治疗)。使用混合对数模型进行数据分析。计算了属性水平的边际 WTP 和相对属性重要性。共有 1002 名受访者完成了 DCE。总体而言,受访者愿意支付 39.52 英镑,将 6 周的治疗等待时间缩短至 2 周,愿意支付 13.55 英镑,由牙医而不是治疗师进行治疗,将填充颜色从银灰色改为白色支付 41.66 英镑,将治疗时间减少 1 分钟支付 0.27 英镑,将从持续到无术后疼痛的情况支付 116.52 英镑,将修复体的使用寿命延长 1 年支付 5.44 英镑。支付能力影响支付意愿,低收入受访者更有可能选择不治疗,并且对修复体颜色(白色)和增加的寿命的价值的评价明显低于收入较高的受访者。临床医生应该了解修复体选择的潜在驱动因素,以便能够与个别患者讨论并获得同意。政策制定者在考虑逐步淘汰汞合金修复体时,应考虑一般人群对修复体结果和服务的偏好,并认识到收入如何影响这些偏好。