Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney Sydney Australia.
Department of Cardiology Royal North Shore Hospital Sydney Australia.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):e024818. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024818. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
Background A significant proportion of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) have no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) and have unexpected worse 30-day outcomes compared with those with SMuRFs. The aim of this article is to examine outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI in the absence of SMuRFs. Methods and Results Presenting features, management, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI without SmuRFs (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) were compared with those with SmuRFs in the Swedish MI registry SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; 2005-2018). Cox proportional hazard models were used. Out of 99 718 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI, 11 131 (11.2%) had no SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.30], <0.0001; and HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.13-1.38]), a difference that remained after adjustment for age and sex. SMuRF-less patients were less likely to receive secondary prevention statins (76% versus 82%); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockade (54% versus 72%); or β-blockers (81% versus 87%, for all <0.0001), with lowest rates observed in women without SMuRFs. In patients who survived to 30 days, rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death were lower in patients without SMuRFs compared with those with risk factors, over 12 years. Conclusions One in 10 patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation MI present without traditional risk factors. The excess 30-day mortality rate in this group emphasizes the need for both improved population-based strategies for prevention of MI, as well as the need for equitable evidence-based treatment at the time of an MI.
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中有相当一部分没有标准的可改变心血管风险因素(SMuRFs),与有 SMuRFs 的患者相比,他们在 30 天内的预后出乎意料地更差。本文旨在研究无 SMuRFs 的非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的结局。
在瑞典 MI 注册研究 SWEDEHEART(根据推荐治疗方案评估的基于证据的心脏病增强和发展的瑞典网络系统;2005-2018 年)中,比较了无 SMuRFs(高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、吸烟)的 NSTEMI 患者的临床表现、治疗和结局,与有 SMuRFs 的患者进行比较。使用 Cox 比例风险模型。在 99718 例 NSTEMI 患者中,有 11131 例(11.2%)没有 SMuRFs。无 SMuRFs 的患者在 30 天内心脏原因和心血管原因的死亡率更高(风险比 [HR],1.20[95%CI,1.10-1.30],<0.0001;和 HR,1.25[95%CI,1.13-1.38]),这一差异在调整年龄和性别后仍然存在。无 SMuRFs 的患者接受二级预防他汀类药物治疗的可能性较小(76% 比 82%);血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(54% 比 72%);或β受体阻滞剂(81% 比 87%,均 <0.0001),在无 SMuRFs 的女性中观察到的比例最低。在存活至 30 天的患者中,与有危险因素的患者相比,无 SMuRFs 的患者在 12 年以上的时间内,全因和心血管死亡的发生率较低。
10 名出现非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的患者中,有 1 名患者无传统危险因素。该组患者 30 天内死亡率过高,强调需要改善心肌梗死的人群预防策略,以及在心肌梗死发生时需要公平的基于证据的治疗。