• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2015-2020 年华盛顿州行人伤害地点周围的微观行人环境。

Microscale pedestrian environment surrounding pedestrian injury sites in Washington state, 2015-2020.

机构信息

Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(7):440-445. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2100363. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2022.2100363
PMID:35877997
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While microscale pedestrian environment features such as sidewalks and crosswalks can affect pedestrian safety, it is challenging to assess microscale environment associated risk across locations or at scale. Addressing these challenges requires an efficient auditing protocol that can be used to assess frequencies of microscale environment features. For this reason, we developed an eight-item pedestrian environment virtual audit protocol and conducted a descriptive epidemiologic study of pedestrian injury in Washington State, USA.

METHODS

We used data from police reports at pedestrian-automotive collision sites where the pedestrian was seriously injured or died. At each collision site, high school students participating in an online summer internship program virtually audited Google Street View imagery to assess the presence of microscale pedestrian environment features such as crosswalks and streetlighting. We assessed inter-rater reliability using Cohen's kappa and explored prevalence of eight microscale environment features in relation to injury severity and municipal boundaries.

RESULTS

There were 2248 motor vehicle crashes eliciting police response and resulting in death or serious injury of a pedestrian in Washington State between January 1, 2015 and May 8, 2020. Of the crashes resulting in serious injury or death, 498 (22%) resulted in fatalities and 1840 (82%) occurred within municipal boundaries. Cohen's kappa scores for the eight pedestrian features that were audited ranged from 0.52 to 0.86. Audit results confirmed that features such as sidewalks and crosswalks were more common at collision sites within city limits.

CONCLUSIONS

High school student volunteers with minimal training can reliably audit microscale pedestrian environments using limited resources.

摘要

目的

虽然人行道和横道线等微观行人环境特征会影响行人安全,但评估跨地点或大规模的微观环境相关风险具有挑战性。解决这些挑战需要一个高效的审计协议,该协议可用于评估微观环境特征的频率。出于这个原因,我们开发了一个八项行人环境虚拟审计协议,并对美国华盛顿州的行人伤害进行了描述性流行病学研究。

方法

我们使用了在行人与汽车碰撞现场的警方报告中的数据,在这些现场,行人严重受伤或死亡。在每个碰撞现场,参与在线暑期实习计划的高中生使用虚拟审计 Google 街景图像来评估人行道和街灯等微观行人环境特征的存在情况。我们使用 Cohen's kappa 评估了内部评估者的可靠性,并探讨了八个微观环境特征在与伤害严重程度和市政边界相关方面的流行程度。

结果

在 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 8 日期间,华盛顿州发生了 2248 起引发警方响应并导致行人死亡或重伤的机动车碰撞事故。在导致重伤或死亡的事故中,有 498 起(22%)导致死亡,1840 起(82%)发生在市政边界内。经过审计的八项行人特征的 Cohen's kappa 评分范围从 0.52 到 0.86。审计结果证实,在城市范围内的碰撞现场,人行道和横道线等特征更为常见。

结论

经过最少培训的高中生志愿者可以使用有限的资源可靠地审计微观行人环境。

相似文献

1
Microscale pedestrian environment surrounding pedestrian injury sites in Washington state, 2015-2020.2015-2020 年华盛顿州行人伤害地点周围的微观行人环境。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(7):440-445. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2100363. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Multilevel models for evaluating the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions at intersections and mid-blocks.用于评估十字路口和街区中部行人与机动车碰撞风险的多层次模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians.人行横道标线与老年行人发生行人-机动车碰撞事故的风险
JAMA. 2002 Nov 6;288(17):2136-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.17.2136.
4
Online versus in-person comparison of Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS) assessments: reliability of alternate methods.线上与线下微型行人街道评估 (MAPS) 比较:替代方法的可靠性。
Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Aug 4;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0101-0.
5
Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS).利用谷歌街景评估微观环境:虚拟系统评估行人街道景观工具(Virtual-STEPS)。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):1246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3.
6
Development and Validation of a Google Street View Pedestrian Safety Audit Tool.开发和验证谷歌街景行人安全审核工具。
Epidemiology. 2020 Mar;31(2):301-309. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001124.
7
Google Street View assessment of environmental safety features at the scene of pedestrian automobile injury.谷歌街景评估行人与汽车事故现场的环境安全特征。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1):82-86. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002338.
8
Virtual audits of the urban streetscape: comparing the inter-rater reliability of GigaPan® to Google Street View.虚拟城市街景审核:比较 GigaPan® 与谷歌街景的评分者间信度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Aug 12;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00226-0.
9
The risk of pedestrian injury and fatality in collisions with motor vehicles, a social ecological study of state routes and city streets in King County, Washington.与机动车碰撞致行人受伤和死亡的风险:华盛顿州金县州级道路和城市街道的社会生态学研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
10
How does street environment affect pedestrian crash risks? A link-level analysis using street view image-based pedestrian exposure measurement.街道环境如何影响行人碰撞风险?基于街景图像的行人暴露测量的路段级分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Sep;205:107682. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107682. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Built Environment Change over Time Using Google Street View Assessments of Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) Cities.利用谷歌街景对西班牙裔社区健康研究/拉丁裔研究(HCHS/SOL)城市进行的随时间变化的建成环境评估
J Urban Health. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s11524-025-00980-1.