Suppr超能文献

美国护士与非护士在 COVID-19 第一年的经历比较:一项全国登记研究的结果。

Experiences of U.S. Nurses Compared With Nonnurses in the First Year of COVID-19: Findings From a National Registry.

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2022;71(6):421-431. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000610. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing professional organizations and media sources indicated early in the pandemic that the physical and psychological effects of COVID-19 might be distinct and possibly greater in nurses than in other types of healthcare workers (HCWs).

OBJECTIVES

Based on survey data collected in Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO), a national registry of U.S. HCWs, this study compared the self-reported experiences of nurses with other HCWs during the first 13 months of the pandemic.

METHODS

Nurse responses were compared to responses of nonnurse HCWs in terms of viral exposure, testing and infection, access to personal protective equipment (PPE), burnout, and well-being. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between nurse and nonnurse roles for the binary end points of viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19. We also examined differences by race/ethnicity and high-risk versus low-risk practice settings.

RESULTS

Of 24,343 HCWs in the registry, one third self-identified as nurses. Nurses were more likely than other HCWs to report exposure to SARS-CoV-2, problems accessing PPE, and decreased personal well-being, including burnout, feeling tired, stress, trouble sleeping, and worry. In adjusted models, nurses were more likely than nonnurse HCWs to report viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19 infection. Nurses in high-risk settings were more likely to report viral exposure and symptoms related to well-being; nurses in low-risk settings were more likely to report viral testing and test positivity. Black or Hispanic nurses were most likely to report test positivity.

DISCUSSION

Differences were identified between nurses and nonnurse HCWs in access to PPE, physical and mental well-being measures, and likelihood of reporting exposure and infection. Among nurses, testing and infection differed based on race and ethnicity, and type of work setting. Our findings suggest further research and policy are needed to elucidate and address social and occupational disparities.

摘要

背景

护理专业组织和媒体资源在疫情早期表示,COVID-19 的身体和心理影响可能在护士中比在其他类型的医护人员(HCWs)中更为明显且可能更大。

目的

本研究基于美国 HCWs 国家登记处 Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes(HERO)中收集的调查数据,比较了在疫情的前 13 个月中,护士与其他 HCWs 报告的自身经历。

方法

根据病毒暴露、检测和感染、个人防护设备(PPE)的获取、倦怠和健康状况,将护士的反应与非护士 HCWs 的反应进行比较。使用逻辑回归模型来检查护士和非护士角色与 COVID-19 病毒检测和检测阳性的二进制终点之间的关联。我们还按种族/族裔和高风险与低风险实践环境检查了差异。

结果

在登记处的 24343 名 HCWs 中,有三分之一的人自我认定为护士。与其他 HCWs 相比,护士更有可能报告接触 SARS-CoV-2、获取 PPE 存在问题以及个人健康状况下降,包括倦怠、疲倦、压力、睡眠困难和担忧。在调整后的模型中,护士比非护士 HCWs 更有可能报告 COVID-19 感染的病毒检测和检测阳性。高风险环境中的护士更有可能报告病毒暴露和与健康相关的症状;低风险环境中的护士更有可能报告病毒检测和检测阳性。黑人或西班牙裔护士最有可能报告检测阳性。

讨论

在获取 PPE、身体和心理健康衡量标准以及报告暴露和感染的可能性方面,护士和非护士 HCWs 之间存在差异。在护士中,根据种族和族裔以及工作环境类型,检测和感染情况有所不同。我们的研究结果表明,需要进一步研究和政策来阐明和解决社会和职业差距。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Occupational COVID-19 exposures and secondary cases among healthcare personnel.医护人员职业性 COVID-19 暴露及继发病例。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Oct;49(10):1334-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验