Lipp Ottmar V, Luck Camilla C, Ney Luke J, Waters Allison M
School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
School of Population Health, Curtin University, Australia.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Oct;180:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
Past research has shown that Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) affects Pavlovian fear conditioning processes. In particular, extinction of learned fear is delayed in those reporting high IU. Reports of differences during acquisition are less consistent with most of the studies reporting no evidence for effects of IU. This may be due to past studies' focus on first interval electrodermal responses or fear potentiated startle, rather than on indices that may better capture uncertainty - like the response to the absence of a probabilistic unconditional stimulus. The current analysis combined data across three experiments that employed a 50 % reinforcement schedule and assessed electrodermal responses and (in two experiments) ratings of conditional stimulus pleasantness. Participants scoring high on IU showed overall larger electrodermal first interval responses during habituation and acquisition but did not differ from those scoring low on IU in differential conditioning (the difference between CS+ and CS-), as indicated by electrodermal first or second interval responses or ratings of CS pleasantness. However, participants high in IU showed larger differential third interval electrodermal responses to the omission of the electro-tactile unconditional stimulus during acquisition. Some evidence for this difference emerged in each experiment, supporting the reliability of the result. The current results suggest that effects of IU emerge in conditions of high uncertainty in Pavlovian fear learning tasks, such as during the omission of probabilistic unconditional stimuli.
过去的研究表明,不确定性不耐受(IU)会影响巴甫洛夫式恐惧条件反射过程。具体而言,在报告高IU的个体中,习得性恐惧的消退会延迟。关于习得过程中差异的报告与大多数研究不太一致,大多数研究没有发现IU产生影响的证据。这可能是由于过去的研究侧重于首次间隔皮肤电反应或恐惧增强的惊吓反应,而不是那些可能更好地捕捉不确定性的指标——比如对概率性无条件刺激缺失的反应。当前的分析整合了三个实验的数据,这些实验采用了50%的强化计划,并评估了皮肤电反应以及(在两个实验中)条件刺激愉悦度评分。IU得分高的参与者在习惯化和习得过程中总体上表现出更大的首次间隔皮肤电反应,但在辨别性条件反射(CS+和CS-之间的差异)方面,与IU得分低的参与者没有差异,这通过首次或第二次间隔皮肤电反应或CS愉悦度评分来表明。然而,在习得过程中,IU得分高的参与者对电触觉无条件刺激缺失的第三次间隔皮肤电反应差异更大。每个实验都出现了这种差异的一些证据,支持了结果的可靠性。当前结果表明,在巴甫洛夫式恐惧学习任务的高不确定性条件下,如在概率性无条件刺激缺失期间,IU会产生影响。