Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Bldg. W34, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AL, Reading, UK.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jul;177:249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 13.
Individuals who score high in self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) tend to find uncertainty unacceptable and aversive. In recent years, research has shed light on the role of IU in modulating subjective (i.e. expectancy ratings) and psychophysiological responses (i.e. skin conductance) across different classical fear conditioning procedures. In particular, during immediate extinction higher IU is associated with disrupted safety learning. However, there remain gaps in understanding how IU, in comparison to other negative emotionality traits (STAI-T), impact different types of subjective and psychophysiological measures during different classical fear conditioning procedures. In our exploratory study, we analyzed IU, STAI-T, subjective (i.e. fear ratings) and psychophysiological (i.e. skin conductance, auditory startle blink) data recorded during fear acquisition training and 24 h-delayed extinction training (n = 66). Higher IU, controlled for STAI-T, was: (1) significantly associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear cue during fear acquisition training, and (2) at trend associated with greater fear ratings to the learned fear versus safe cue during delayed extinction training. Null results were observed for both IU and STAI-T in relation to skin conductance and auditory startle blink during fear acquisition training and delayed extinction training. These results add to and extend our current understanding of the role of IU on subjective and physiological measures during different fear conditioning procedures particularly that of subjective fear ratings during acquisition and delayed extinction training. Implications of these findings and future directions are discussed.
个体在自我报告的不确定性容忍度(IU)上得分较高,往往会觉得不确定性是无法接受和令人厌恶的。近年来,研究揭示了 IU 在调节不同经典恐惧条件反射程序中的主观(即预期评分)和心理生理反应(即皮肤电传导)中的作用。特别是,在立即消退期间,较高的 IU 与安全学习受损有关。然而,IU 如何与其他负面情绪特质(STAI-T)相比,在不同的经典恐惧条件反射程序中,对不同类型的主观和心理生理测量产生影响,这方面的理解仍然存在差距。在我们的探索性研究中,我们分析了 IU、STAI-T、主观(即恐惧评分)和心理生理(即皮肤电传导、听觉惊跳眨眼)数据,这些数据是在恐惧获得训练和 24 小时延迟消退训练期间记录的(n=66)。在控制了 STAI-T 之后,较高的 IU:(1)与恐惧获得训练期间对习得的恐惧线索的恐惧评分显著相关,(2)与延迟消退训练期间对习得的恐惧与安全线索的恐惧评分呈趋势相关。在恐惧获得训练和延迟消退训练期间,IU 和 STAI-T 与皮肤电传导和听觉惊跳眨眼均未呈现出显著结果。这些结果增加和扩展了我们对 IU 在不同恐惧条件反射程序中的主观和生理测量中的作用的理解,特别是在获得和延迟消退训练期间的主观恐惧评分方面。讨论了这些发现的意义和未来的方向。