• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项联合设计的综合干预措施的混合方法可接受性评估,该措施旨在在大流行期间支持重症监护病房中气道情况危急的患者进行沟通。

Mixed-method acceptability evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit during a pandemic.

作者信息

Istanboulian Laura, Rose Louise, Yunusova Yana, Dale Craig

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Provincial Prolonged-Ventilation Weaning Centre for Excellence and Long-Term Ventilation, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Nov;28(6):1069-1077. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12828. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.12828
PMID:35878874
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although bundled communication interventions are recommended to address communication barriers for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit (ICU) such interventions have not been evaluated in pandemic conditions.

AIM

To evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication with adult patients with an advanced airway in ICU in pandemic conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, convergent mixed method design in a single centre medical-surgical ICU in Toronto, Canada between September 2021-March 2022. After the use of the co-designed bundled communication intervention quantitative data were collected from health care providers using validated acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility measures and analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected from providers, patients and families using semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis applying the theoretical framework of acceptability. Joint table analysis enabled the integration of the two data sets.

RESULTS

A total of 64 (41.3%) HCPs responded to the survey: 54 (84.4%) rated the intervention acceptable; 55 (85.9%) appropriate; and 49 (76.6%) feasible for use in this context. Qualitative data (23 interviews: 13 healthcare providers, 6 families and 4 patients) and the joint table analysis extended the understanding that intervention acceptability was related to positive affective attitudes and reduced communication frustration. Appropriateness and feasibility were promoted through intervention alignment with values, ability to personalize tools, and ease of access. Recommendations to improve the acceptability included adaptation for immobilized and/or restrained patients, additional education, and integration into existing workflows.

CONCLUSIONS

This mixed method evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support patient communication in the ICU during pandemic conditions demonstrated high rated and described acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility by participants.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

A co-designed communication intervention demonstrating stakeholder acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility can be implemented into clinical practice in pandemic and other infection prevention and control contexts.

摘要

背景

尽管推荐采用综合沟通干预措施来解决重症监护病房(ICU)中气道管理患者的沟通障碍,但此类干预措施尚未在大流行情况下进行评估。

目的

评估一项共同设计的综合干预措施在大流行情况下支持加拿大安大略省多伦多一家单中心内科-外科ICU成年气道管理患者沟通的可接受性、适宜性和可行性。

研究设计

2021年9月至2022年3月在加拿大安大略省多伦多一家单中心内科-外科ICU进行前瞻性、收敛性混合方法设计。在使用共同设计的综合沟通干预措施后,使用经过验证的可接受性、适宜性和可行性指标从医疗保健提供者处收集定量数据,并使用描述性统计进行分析。使用半结构化访谈从提供者、患者和家属处收集定性数据,并使用应用可接受性理论框架的内容分析进行分析。联合表格分析实现了两个数据集的整合。

结果

共有64名(41.3%)医护人员回复了调查:54名(84.4%)认为该干预措施可接受;55名(85.9%)认为适宜;49名(76.6%)认为在此情况下可行。定性数据(23次访谈:13名医护人员、6名家属和4名患者)和联合表格分析进一步表明,干预措施的可接受性与积极的情感态度和减少的沟通挫折感有关。通过使干预措施与价值观保持一致、工具个性化的能力以及易于获取,提高了适宜性和可行性。提高可接受性的建议包括针对固定和/或约束患者进行调整、增加教育以及融入现有工作流程。

结论

这项对共同设计的综合干预措施在大流行情况下支持ICU患者沟通的混合方法评估显示,参与者对该措施的评价很高,并描述了其可接受性、适宜性和可行性。

与临床实践的相关性

一项展示了利益相关者可接受性、适宜性和可行性的共同设计沟通干预措施可在大流行及其他感染预防和控制环境中实施到临床实践中。

相似文献

1
Mixed-method acceptability evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit during a pandemic.一项联合设计的综合干预措施的混合方法可接受性评估,该措施旨在在大流行期间支持重症监护病房中气道情况危急的患者进行沟通。
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Nov;28(6):1069-1077. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12828. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
Protocol for a mixed method acceptability evaluation of a codesigned bundled COmmunication intervention for use in the adult ICU during the COVID-19 PandEmic: the COPE study.COVID-19 大流行期间成人 ICU 中使用的联合设计捆绑式沟通干预措施的混合方法可接受性评估方案:COPE 研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 13;11(9):e050347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050347.
3
A multicomponent intervention to optimise nurse-patient communication in the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods acceptability and feasibility study.多组分干预措施优化重症监护病房的护患沟通:一项混合方法的可接受性和可行性研究。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Nov;35(6):616-622. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Acceptability of the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement virtual intervention for home mechanical ventilation patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative evaluation.新冠疫情期间家庭机械通气患者长期居家呼吸机使用虚拟干预措施的可接受性:一项定性评估
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 27;10:20552076241228417. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228417. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Cue-based versus scheduled feeding for preterm infants transitioning from tube to oral feeding: the Cubs mixed-methods feasibility study.基于线索的喂养与计划性喂养在早产儿经管饲向口服喂养过渡中的比较:Cubs 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Dec;25(74):1-146. doi: 10.3310/hta25740.
6
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
7
Formative Evaluation of a Comprehensive Self-Management Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Comorbid Anxiety, and Depression: Mixed Methods Study.肠易激综合征、共病焦虑和抑郁综合自我管理干预的形成性评估:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 31;8:e43286. doi: 10.2196/43286.
8
Adapting co-design methodology to a virtual environment: co-designing a communication intervention for adult patients in critical care.将协同设计方法应用于虚拟环境:为重症监护中的成年患者协同设计一种沟通干预措施。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 13;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00514-6.
9
Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.一项支持慢性医疗保健中共同决策的数字患者-医疗服务提供者沟通干预措施(InvolveMe)的可行性:试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(4):e34738. doi: 10.2196/34738.
10
An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.一项旨在改善痴呆症患者跌倒结局的干预措施:DIFRID 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(59):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta23590.

引用本文的文献

1
Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers.护理伙伴在专业撤机中心的作用报告——患者、护理伙伴及医疗服务提供者的观点
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 30;4:1439410. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1439410. eCollection 2024.
2
Adapting co-design methodology to a virtual environment: co-designing a communication intervention for adult patients in critical care.将协同设计方法应用于虚拟环境:为重症监护中的成年患者协同设计一种沟通干预措施。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 13;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00514-6.