• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间家庭机械通气患者长期居家呼吸机使用虚拟干预措施的可接受性:一项定性评估

Acceptability of the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement virtual intervention for home mechanical ventilation patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative evaluation.

作者信息

Dale Craig M, Ambreen Munazzah, Kang Sohee, Buchanan Francine, Pizzuti Regina, Gershon Andrea S, Rose Louise, Amin Reshma

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Tory Trauma Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Jan 27;10:20552076241228417. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228417. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241228417
PMID:38282921
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10822085/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of ventilator-assisted individuals (VAIs) was challenged by social distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2020, the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement (LIVE) Program was launched in Ontario, Canada to provide intensive digital care case management to VAIs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the acceptability of the LIVE Program hosted via a digital platform during the COVID-19 pandemic from diverse perspectives.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative descriptive study (May 2020-April 2021) comprising semi-structured interviews with participants from eight home ventilation specialty centers in Ontario, Canada. We purposively recruited patients, family caregivers, and providers enrolled in LIVE. Content analysis and the theoretical concepts of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness were used to interpret findings.

RESULTS

A total of 40 individuals (2 VAIs, 18 family caregivers, 20 healthcare providers) participated. Participants described LIVE as acceptable as it addressed a longstanding imperative to improve care access, ease of use, and training provided; feasible for triaging problems and sharing information; and appropriate for timeliness of provider responses, workflows, and perceived value. Negative perceptions of acceptability among healthcare providers concerned digital workload and fit with existing clinical workflows. Perceived benefits accorded to LIVE included enhanced physical and psychological safety in the home, patient-provider relations, and VAI engagement in their own care.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings identify factors influencing the LIVE Program's acceptability by patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers during pandemic conditions including enhanced access to care, ease of case management triage, and VAI safety. Findings may inform the implementation of digital health services to VAIs in non-pandemic circumstances.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,社交距离规定给呼吸机辅助患者(VAIs)的临床管理带来了挑战。2020年5月,加拿大安大略省启动了长期居家呼吸机参与(LIVE)项目,为VAIs提供强化数字护理病例管理。这项定性研究的目的是从不同角度探讨在新冠疫情期间通过数字平台开展的LIVE项目的可接受性。

方法

我们进行了一项定性描述性研究(2020年5月至2021年4月),包括对加拿大安大略省八个家庭通气专科中心的参与者进行半结构化访谈。我们有目的地招募了参与LIVE项目的患者、家庭护理人员和提供者。采用内容分析以及可接受性、可行性和适宜性的理论概念来解释研究结果。

结果

共有40人参与(2名VAIs患者、18名家庭护理人员、20名医疗保健提供者)。参与者认为LIVE项目是可接受的,因为它解决了长期以来改善护理可及性、易用性和所提供培训的迫切需求;在对问题进行分类和共享信息方面是可行的;在提供者响应的及时性、工作流程和感知价值方面是适宜的。医疗保健提供者对可接受性的负面看法涉及数字工作量以及与现有临床工作流程的契合度。LIVE项目的感知益处包括增强家庭中的身体和心理安全、患者与提供者的关系以及VAIs患者对自身护理的参与度。

结论

研究结果确定了在疫情期间影响患者、家庭护理人员和医疗保健提供者对LIVE项目可接受性的因素,包括改善护理可及性、病例管理分类的便利性和VAIs患者的安全。研究结果可能为在非疫情情况下向VAIs患者提供数字健康服务提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/10822085/a5b6d76e143b/10.1177_20552076241228417-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/10822085/a5b6d76e143b/10.1177_20552076241228417-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/10822085/a5b6d76e143b/10.1177_20552076241228417-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement virtual intervention for home mechanical ventilation patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative evaluation.新冠疫情期间家庭机械通气患者长期居家呼吸机使用虚拟干预措施的可接受性:一项定性评估
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 27;10:20552076241228417. doi: 10.1177/20552076241228417. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Opening the digital front door for individuals using long-term in-home ventilation (LIVE) during a pandemic- implementation, feasibility and acceptability.在大流行期间为长期居家使用通气设备(LIVE)的个体打开数字前门——实施、可行性和可接受性
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 7;9:20552076231213447. doi: 10.1177/20552076231213447. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Patient and provider perception of appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of behavioral health home (BHH) core components based on program implementation in an urban, safety-net health system.基于城市安全网医疗系统中的项目实施情况,患者与医疗服务提供者对行为健康之家(BHH)核心组成部分的适宜性、可接受性和可行性的认知。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Nov 1;2:26334895211043791. doi: 10.1177/26334895211043791. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Mixed-method acceptability evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit during a pandemic.一项联合设计的综合干预措施的混合方法可接受性评估,该措施旨在在大流行期间支持重症监护病房中气道情况危急的患者进行沟通。
Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Nov;28(6):1069-1077. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12828. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
Development of a Web-Based Peer Support Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Assisted Individuals Living in the Community: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.为社区中使用呼吸机的个体的家庭照顾者开发基于网络的同伴支持项目:一项试点随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Feb 6;8(2):e11827. doi: 10.2196/11827.
6
The Transitions to Long-term In Home Ventilator Engagement Study (Transitions to LIVE): study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.长期家庭呼吸机使用研究的过渡(Transitions to LIVE):一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 7;23(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06035-z.
7
Virtual home-based palliative care during COVID-19: A qualitative exploration of the patient, caregiver, and healthcare provider experience.新冠疫情期间的虚拟居家姑息治疗:对患者、照护者和医疗保健提供者体验的定性探索。
Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;36(9):1374-1388. doi: 10.1177/02692163221116251. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响为需要康复的人提供家庭康复服务的因素:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 10;2(2):CD014823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014823.
9
The impact of COVID-19 on patient engagement with primary healthcare: lessons from the saudi primary care setting.COVID-19 对患者参与初级医疗保健的影响:来自沙特初级医疗保健环境的经验教训。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 6;24(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02131-4.
10
The pandemic experiences of Ontario perinatal providers: a qualitative study.安大略省围产期提供者的大流行经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10079-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating remote healthcare practices: Experiences and recommendations of healthcare professionals on smart applications.评估远程医疗实践:医疗保健专业人员对智能应用的经验与建议。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 14;11:20552076251315786. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315786. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory failure on home mechanical ventilation.慢性呼吸衰竭患者在家机械通气中的生活质量。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 May 3;32(168). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0237-2022. Print 2023 Jun 30.
2
Difficulties accessing health care in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: Comparing individuals with and without chronic conditions.在 COVID-19 大流行期间加拿大获取医疗保健的困难:比较有和没有慢性病的个体。
Health Rep. 2022 Nov 16;33(11):16-26. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201100002-eng.
3
Telemedicine and virtual respiratory care in the era of COVID-19.
COVID-19时代的远程医疗与虚拟呼吸护理
ERJ Open Res. 2022 Jul 25;8(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00111-2022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Virtual care use during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on healthcare utilization in patients with chronic disease: A population-based repeated cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用虚拟护理及其对慢性病患者医疗利用的影响:基于人群的重复横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 25;17(4):e0267218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267218. eCollection 2022.
5
Digital health for quality healthcare: A systematic mapping of review studies.用于优质医疗保健的数字健康:综述研究的系统映射
Digit Health. 2022 Mar 18;8:20552076221085810. doi: 10.1177/20552076221085810. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Clinicians and Older Adults' Perceptions of the Utility of Patient-Generated Health Data in Caring for Older Adults: Exploratory Mixed Methods Study.临床医生与老年人对患者生成的健康数据在老年人护理中效用的看法:探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2021 Nov 5;4(4):e29788. doi: 10.2196/29788.
7
An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research.护理研究中的定性描述性设计概述。
J Res Nurs. 2020 Aug;25(5):443-455. doi: 10.1177/1744987119880234. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
8
Telemedicine in the management of patients with chronic respiratory failure.远程医疗在慢性呼吸衰竭患者管理中的应用
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Mar;17(1):210008. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0008-2021.
9
COVID-19 and Chronic Disease: The Impact Now and in the Future.新冠疫情与慢性病:当下及未来的影响
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Jun 17;18:E62. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.210086.
10
Acceptability of digital health interventions: embracing the complexity.数字健康干预措施的可接受性:拥抱复杂性。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1473-1480. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab048.