Istanboulian Laura, Rose Louise, Yunusova Yana, Dale Craig
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Toronto Metropolitan University, 288 Church St., Toronto, M5B 1Z5, Canada.
Michael Garron Hospital, 825 Coxwell Ave., Toronto, M4C 3E7, Canada.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 13;9(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00514-6.
Research co-design is recommended to reduce misalignment between researcher and end-user needs and priorities for healthcare innovation. Engagement of intensive care unit patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders in co-design has historically relied upon face-to-face meetings. Here, we report on our co-design processes for the development of a bundled intensive care unit patient communication intervention that used exclusively virtual meeting methods in response to COVID-19 pandemic social distancing restrictions.
We conducted a series of virtual co-design sessions with a committee of stakeholder participants recruited from a medical-surgical intensive care unit of a community teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada. Published recommendations for co-design methods were used with exclusively virtual adaptations to improve ease of stakeholder participation as well as the quality and consistency of co-design project set-up, facilitation, and evaluation. Virtual adaptations included the use of email for distributing information, videos, and electronic evaluations as well as the use of a videoconferencing platform for synchronous meetings. We used a flexible meeting plan including asynchronous virtual methods to reduce attendance barriers for time-constrained participants.
Co-design participants included a patient and a family member (n = 2) and professionally diverse healthcare providers (n = 9), plus a facilitator. Overall, participants were engaged and reported a positive experience with the virtually adapted co-design process. Reported benefits included incorporation of diverse viewpoints in the communication intervention design and implementation plan. Challenges related to lack of hands-on time during development of the co-designed intervention and participant availability to meet regularly albeit virtually.
This report describes the methods, benefits, and challenges of adapting in-person co-design methods to a virtual environment to produce a bundled communication intervention for use in the adult intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adapting recommended co-design methods to a virtual environment can provide further opportunities for stakeholder participation in intervention design.
建议采用研究协同设计来减少研究人员与最终用户在医疗保健创新需求和优先事项上的不一致。重症监护病房患者、临床医生和其他利益相关者参与协同设计历来依赖面对面会议。在此,我们报告我们的协同设计过程,该过程用于开发一项捆绑式重症监护病房患者沟通干预措施,该措施为应对新冠疫情期间的社交距离限制而专门采用了虚拟会议方法。
我们与一个利益相关者委员会进行了一系列虚拟协同设计会议,该委员会的参与者来自加拿大多伦多一家社区教学医院的内科-外科重症监护病房。我们采用已发表的协同设计方法建议,并专门进行虚拟调整,以提高利益相关者参与的便利性以及协同设计项目设置、促进和评估的质量与一致性。虚拟调整包括使用电子邮件分发信息、视频和电子评估,以及使用视频会议平台进行同步会议。我们使用了一个灵活的会议计划,包括异步虚拟方法,以减少时间受限参与者的参与障碍。
协同设计参与者包括一名患者和一名家庭成员(n = 2)以及专业背景多样的医疗保健提供者(n = 9),外加一名主持人。总体而言,参与者参与度高,并报告对虚拟调整后的协同设计过程有积极体验。报告的益处包括在沟通干预设计和实施计划中纳入了不同观点。挑战包括在协同设计干预措施开发过程中缺乏实际操作时间,以及参与者虽能进行虚拟会议但难以定期参会。
本报告描述了将面对面协同设计方法调整到虚拟环境以产生一项用于新冠疫情期间成人重症监护病房的捆绑式沟通干预措施的方法、益处和挑战。将推荐的协同设计方法调整到虚拟环境可为利益相关者参与干预设计提供更多机会。