Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Avda de Elvas s/n, 06080, Badajoz. Spain.
Internal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, Avda de Elvas s/n, 06080, Badajoz. Spain.
Eur J Intern Med. 2022 Oct;104:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
This work aims to compare the characteristics of advanced heart failure (HF) in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to determine the relevance of variables used to define advanced HF.
This cross-sectional, multicenter study included patients hospitalized for HF. They were classified into four groups according to presence/absence of advanced HF, determined based on general and cardiac criteria, and presence/absence of DM. To analyze the importance of variables, we grew a random forest algorithm (RF) based on mortality at six months.
A total of 3153 patients were included. The prevalence of advanced HF among patients with DM was 24% compared to 23% among those without DM (p=0.53). Patients with advanced HF and DM had more comorbidity related to cardiovascular and renal diseases; their prognosis was the poorest (log-rank <0.0001) though the adjusted hazard ratio by group in the Cox regression analysis was not significant. The variables that were significantly related to mortality were the number of comorbidities (p=0.005) and systolic blood pressure (p=0.024). The RF showed that general criteria were more important for defining advanced HF than cardiac criteria.
Patients with advanced HF and DM were characterized by DM in progression with macro and microvascular complications. The outcomes among advanced HF patients were poor; patients with advanced HF and DM had the poorest outcomes. General criteria were the most important to establish accurately a definition of advanced HF, being decisive the evidence of disease progression in patients with DM.
本研究旨在比较伴有和不伴有 2 型糖尿病(DM)的晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者的特征,并确定用于定义晚期 HF 的变量的相关性。
这是一项横断面、多中心研究,纳入了因 HF 住院的患者。根据一般和心脏标准以及 DM 的存在与否,将他们分为四组:存在/不存在晚期 HF。为了分析变量的重要性,我们基于 6 个月时的死亡率生成了一个随机森林算法(RF)。
共纳入 3153 例患者。与无 DM 患者相比,DM 患者中晚期 HF 的患病率为 24%(p=0.53)。合并心血管和肾脏疾病相关合并症的晚期 HF 合并 DM 患者比例较高,预后最差(log-rank <0.0001),但 Cox 回归分析中按组调整的危险比无统计学意义。与死亡率显著相关的变量是共病数量(p=0.005)和收缩压(p=0.024)。RF 显示,一般标准比心脏标准更能准确定义晚期 HF。
合并进展性 DM 及大血管和微血管并发症的患者表现为晚期 HF。晚期 HF 患者的预后较差;合并晚期 HF 和 DM 的患者预后最差。一般标准是准确建立晚期 HF 定义的最重要标准,DM 患者的疾病进展证据具有决定性意义。