Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6609-6616. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08766-7. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
One approach to evaluate decision-making is using the concept of decision regret, which measures patient remorse after a healthcare decision. This is particularly important for elective, preference-sensitive conditions with multiple treatment options, such as ventral and inguinal hernia repair. In this study, we assessed decision regret among patients who pursued surgical management of ventral and inguinal hernias.
We retrospectively reviewed a statewide registry of adult patients who underwent elective ventral and inguinal hernia repair between January 2017 and March 2020 and completed a validated survey measuring decision regret. 30-day outcomes included complications, emergency department (ED) utilization, readmission, and reoperation. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association of regret with age, sex, race, insurance status, ASA, tobacco use, diabetes, admission status, surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic), year, and outcomes.
8315 patients underwent surgery during the study period with a mean age of 60.5 (14.7) years and 1812 (22%) female patients. Among 2159 patients who underwent ventral hernia repair, 248 (11%) reported regret to undergo surgery, 64 (3%) experienced a complication, 160 (7%) visited an ED, 86 (4%) were readmitted, and 29 (1%) underwent reoperation. Outcomes associated with regret after ventral hernia repair included complications (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.26-4.29) and readmission (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.51-4.71). Among 6,156 patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair, 533 (9%) reported regret to undergo surgery, 41 (1%) experienced a complication, 304 (5%) visited an ED, 72 (1%) were readmitted, and 63 (1%) underwent reoperation. Outcomes associated with regret after inguinal hernia repair included ED visits (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.44-2.87) and readmission (OR 4.23, 95% CI 2.35-7.61).
Roughly 1 in 10 patients undergoing hernia repair report regret with their decision to undergo surgery. Developing a better understanding of the factors associated with decision regret after hernia repair may better inform both patients and surgeon decision-making.
评估决策的一种方法是使用决策后悔的概念,该概念衡量患者在医疗保健决策后的悔恨程度。对于具有多种治疗选择的选择性、偏好敏感的病症,例如腹侧和腹股沟疝修复,这一点尤为重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了接受腹侧和腹股沟疝手术治疗的患者的决策后悔程度。
我们回顾性地审查了 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间接受择期腹侧和腹股沟疝修复的全州成年患者注册表,并完成了一项衡量决策后悔的验证性调查。30 天结局包括并发症、急诊部(ED)就诊、再入院和再次手术。多变量逻辑回归检查了后悔与年龄、性别、种族、保险状况、ASA、吸烟、糖尿病、入院状态、手术方法(开放、腹腔镜、机器人)、年份和结局的关系。
在研究期间,8315 名患者接受了手术,平均年龄为 60.5(14.7)岁,1812 名(22%)为女性患者。在 2159 名接受腹侧疝修复的患者中,248 名(11%)报告后悔接受手术,64 名(3%)出现并发症,160 名(7%)去 ED,86 名(4%)再入院,29 名(1%)再次手术。腹侧疝修复后与后悔相关的结局包括并发症(OR 2.33,95%CI 1.26-4.29)和再入院(OR 2.67,95%CI 1.51-4.71)。在 6156 名接受腹股沟疝修复的患者中,533 名(9%)报告后悔接受手术,41 名(1%)出现并发症,304 名(5%)去 ED,72 名(1%)再入院,63 名(1%)再次手术。腹股沟疝修复后与后悔相关的结局包括 ED 就诊(OR 2.03,95%CI 1.44-2.87)和再入院(OR 4.23,95%CI 2.35-7.61)。
大约每 10 名接受疝修复的患者中就有 1 名报告对手术决定感到后悔。更好地了解疝修复后决策后悔的相关因素可能会更好地为患者和外科医生的决策提供信息。