Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
J Surg Res. 2023 Jul;287:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.030. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Telehealth has been increasingly utilized with a renewed interest by surgical specialties given the COIVD-19 pandemic. Limited data exists evaluating the safety of routine postoperative telehealth follow-up in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, especially those who present urgent/emergently. Our study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative telehealth follow-up in veterans undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
Retrospective review of all Veterans who underwent inguinal hernia repair at a tertiary Veterans Affairs Medical Center over a 2-year period (9/2019-9/2021). Outcome measures included postoperative complications, emergency department (ED) utilization, 30-day readmission, and missed adverse events (ED utilization or readmission occurring after routine postoperative follow-up). Patients undergoing additional procedure(s) requiring intraoperative drains and/or nonabsorbable sutures were excluded.
Of 338 patients who underwent qualifying procedures, 156 (50.6%) were followed-up by telehealth and 152 (49.4%) followed-up in-person. There were no differences in age, sex, BMI, race, urgency, laterality nor admission status. Patients with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification [ASA class III 92 (60.5%) versus class II 48 (31.6%), P = 0.019] and open repair [93 (61.2%) versus 67 (42.9%), P = 0.003] were more likely to follow-up in-person. There was no difference in complications, [telehealth 13 (8.3%) versus 20 (13.2%), P = 0.17], ED visits, [telehealth 15 (10%) versus 18 (12%), P = 0.53], 30-day readmission [telehealth 3 (2%) versus 0 (0%), P = 0.09], nor missed adverse events [telehealth 6 (33.3%) versus 5 (27.8%), P = 0.72].
There were no differences in postoperative complications, ED utilization, 30-day readmission, or missed adverse events for those who followed-up in person versus telehealth after elective or urgent/emergent inguinal hernia repair. Veterans with a higher ASA class and who underwent open repair were more likely to be seen in person. Telehealth follow-up after inguinal hernia repair is safe and effective.
鉴于 COVID-19 大流行,外科专业对远程医疗的兴趣日益浓厚。在接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,常规术后远程医疗随访的安全性数据有限,尤其是那些紧急/紧急情况下的患者。我们的研究旨在评估退伍军人接受腹股沟疝修补术后接受术后远程医疗随访的安全性和有效性。
对在一家三级退伍军人事务医疗中心接受腹股沟疝修补术的所有退伍军人进行回顾性回顾,时间为 2 年(2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月)。观察指标包括术后并发症、急诊部(ED)就诊、30 天再入院和漏诊不良事件(ED 就诊或再入院发生在常规术后随访后)。排除接受需要术中引流管和/或不可吸收缝线的其他手术的患者。
在接受合格手术的 338 名患者中,有 156 名(50.6%)通过远程医疗进行了随访,152 名(49.4%)通过门诊进行了随访。两组在年龄、性别、BMI、种族、紧迫性、侧别或入院状态方面无差异。美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级较高的患者[ASA 分级 III 级 92 例(60.5%)与 II 级 48 例(31.6%),P=0.019]和开放式修复[93 例(61.2%)与 67 例(42.9%),P=0.003]更倾向于亲自随访。两组并发症发生率[远程医疗 13 例(8.3%)与 20 例(13.2%),P=0.17]、ED 就诊率[远程医疗 15 例(10%)与 18 例(12%),P=0.53]、30 天再入院率[远程医疗 3 例(2%)与 0 例(0%),P=0.09]和漏诊不良事件率[远程医疗 6 例(33.3%)与 5 例(27.8%),P=0.72]无差异。
在接受择期或紧急/紧急腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,亲自随访与远程医疗随访后的术后并发症、ED 就诊率、30 天再入院率或漏诊不良事件发生率无差异。ASA 分级较高且接受开放式修复的退伍军人更有可能亲自就诊。腹股沟疝修补术后的远程医疗随访是安全有效的。