• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊急性静脉曲张出血患者中 D-二聚体与白蛋白比值用于风险评估的效用:回顾性观察性研究。

Usefulness of the d-dimer to albumin ratio for risk assessment in patients with acute variceal bleeding at the emergency department: retrospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, 27, Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Department of Medical Informatics, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00696-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-022-00696-4
PMID:35879671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9311345/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a severe complication of portal hypertension that is caused by rupture of the esophageal or gastric varix. Scoring system for risk stratification of AVB is difficult to use because various variables must be entered, and it is difficult to apply early in the emergency department (ED). We compared and analyzed the usefulness of the D-dimer to albumin ratio (DAR) for risk stratification of AVB.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, medical records of patients with AVB Between January 2019 and December 2020 were assessed. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether DAR was a predictor of clinical outcomes for AVB. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed using cut-off values determined by the Youden Index. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the factors contributing to the development of outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 67 patients required intensive care. The cut-off value of DAR for patients requiring intensive care was 400. A DAR > 400 (adjusted HR: 5.636 [95% CI: 2.216-14.332]) independently predicted the need for ICU admission in these patients. Overall, 13 patients required long-term hospitalization. The cut-off value of DAR for patients requiring long-term hospitalization was 403. A DAR > 403 (adjusted HR: 9.899 [95% CI: 2.012-48.694]) independently predicted the need for long-term hospitalization. Overall, 95 patients required transfusion. The cut-off value of DAR for patients requiring transfusion was 121. A DAR > 121 (adjusted HR: 4.680 [95% CI: 1.703-12.862]) independently predicted the need for transfusion. Overall, 11 patients died during study period. The cut-off value of DAR for mortality was 450. A DAR > 450 (adjusted HR: 26.261 [95% CI: 3.054-225.827]) independently predicted mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAR can be used for outcome assessment in patients with AVB with various scoring systems, but its explanatory power is not high.

摘要

背景

急性静脉曲张出血 (AVB) 是由食管或胃静脉曲张破裂引起的门静脉高压的严重并发症。用于 AVB 风险分层的评分系统难以使用,因为必须输入各种变量,并且在急诊科 (ED) 早期难以应用。我们比较和分析了 D-二聚体与白蛋白比值 (DAR) 对 AVB 风险分层的有用性。

方法

在这项回顾性观察性研究中,评估了 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间患有 AVB 的患者的病历。主要终点是评估 DAR 是否可预测 AVB 的临床结局。使用由 Youden 指数确定的截断值构建接受者操作特征 (ROC) 曲线。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来评估导致结局发展的因素。

结果

总体而言,67 名患者需要重症监护。需要重症监护的患者 DAR 的截断值为 400。DAR>400(调整后的 HR:5.636 [95%CI:2.216-14.332])可独立预测这些患者需要 ICU 入院。总体而言,13 名患者需要长期住院治疗。需要长期住院治疗的患者 DAR 的截断值为 403。DAR>403(调整后的 HR:9.899 [95%CI:2.012-48.694])可独立预测长期住院的需求。总体而言,95 名患者需要输血。需要输血的患者 DAR 的截断值为 121。DAR>121(调整后的 HR:4.680 [95%CI:1.703-12.862])可独立预测输血需求。总体而言,11 名患者在研究期间死亡。死亡率的 DAR 截断值为 450。DAR>450(调整后的 HR:26.261 [95%CI:3.054-225.827])可独立预测死亡率。

结论

DAR 可用于具有各种评分系统的 AVB 患者的预后评估,但解释能力不高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/bbb64a55514e/12873_2022_696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/0c98f3a1d2fb/12873_2022_696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/4cd60b46dee3/12873_2022_696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/bbb64a55514e/12873_2022_696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/0c98f3a1d2fb/12873_2022_696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/4cd60b46dee3/12873_2022_696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab51/9316336/bbb64a55514e/12873_2022_696_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness of the d-dimer to albumin ratio for risk assessment in patients with acute variceal bleeding at the emergency department: retrospective observational study.急诊急性静脉曲张出血患者中 D-二聚体与白蛋白比值用于风险评估的效用:回顾性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00696-4.
2
Comparison of clinical outcomes between variceal and non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者胃食管静脉曲张出血与非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血的临床结局比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1773-1779. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14147. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
A MELD-based model to determine risk of mortality among patients with acute variceal bleeding.基于 MELD 的模型来确定急性静脉曲张出血患者的死亡率风险。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Feb;146(2):412-19.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 19.
4
Urgent vs. non-urgent endoscopy in stable acute variceal bleeding.稳定型急性静脉曲张出血时的紧急与非紧急内镜检查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 May;104(5):1125-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.78. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
5
Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.急性静脉曲张出血的风险分层:比较AIMS65评分与既定的上消化道出血和肝病严重程度风险分层评分系统在预测死亡率和再出血方面的作用。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):761-768. doi: 10.1111/den.13577. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
The ability of D-dimer, albumin, and D-Dimer/albumin ratio to predict in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit admission in COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department.D-二聚体、白蛋白和 D-二聚体/白蛋白比值预测急诊科收治的 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率和入住重症监护病房的能力。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022;123(12):908-912. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2022_145.
7
Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.肝硬化静脉曲张出血患者风险评分系统的预后价值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 7;25(45):6668-6680. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i45.6668.
8
Association of D-dimer to albumin ratio with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in ischaemic heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study.D-二聚体与白蛋白比值与糖尿病合并缺血性心力衰竭患者不良心血管结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):e078013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078013.
9
Acute Variceal Bleeding: Does Octreotide Improve Outcomes in Patients with Different Functional Hepatic Reserve?急性静脉曲张出血:奥曲肽是否改善不同肝功能储备患者的结局?
Ann Hepatol. 2018 January-February;17(1):125-133. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7544.
10
Delayed endoscopy as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage.延迟内镜检查作为肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者院内死亡的危险因素。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;24(7):1294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05903.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Value of D-Dimer for In-Hospital Mortality in Non-Diabetic Patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.非糖尿病非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者 D-二聚体对住院死亡率的预测价值。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241276820. doi: 10.1177/10760296241276820.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.急性静脉曲张出血的风险分层:远非理想评分。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun 28;76:e2921. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2921. eCollection 2021.
2
Predictive value of D-dimer/albumin ratio and fibrinogen/albumin ratio for in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.D-二聚体/白蛋白比值和纤维蛋白原/白蛋白比值对 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率的预测价值。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14263. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14263. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
AIMS65评分、格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分和罗卡尔评分对静脉曲张性和非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者临床结局预测的前瞻性比较
Clin Endosc. 2021 Mar;54(2):211-221. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.068. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
The impact of albumin infusion on the risk of rebleeding and in-hospital mortality in cirrhotic patients admitted for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study of a single institute.白蛋白输注对因急性胃肠道出血入院的肝硬化患者再出血风险和院内死亡率的影响:一项单机构回顾性研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01337-5.
5
Hypoalbuminemia, Coagulopathy, and Vascular Disease in COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎中的低白蛋白血症、凝血功能障碍和血管疾病
Circ Res. 2020 Jul 17;127(3):400-401. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317173. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.急性静脉曲张出血的风险分层:比较AIMS65评分与既定的上消化道出血和肝病严重程度风险分层评分系统在预测死亡率和再出血方面的作用。
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):761-768. doi: 10.1111/den.13577. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
Scoring Systems for the Patients of Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房患者的评分系统
Acute Crit Care. 2018 May;33(2):102-104. doi: 10.4266/acc.2018.00185. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group.非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的管理:国际共识组的指南推荐。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Inverse relationship of serum albumin to the risk of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill hospitalized patients: Analysis from the APEX trial.血清白蛋白与急性住院患者静脉血栓栓塞风险的反比关系:APEXX 试验分析。
Am J Hematol. 2019 Jan;94(1):21-28. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25296. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Simple Mortality Predictive Models for Improving Critical Care in Resource-Limited Settings: An Insight on the Modified Early Warning Score and Rapid Emergency Medical Score.用于改善资源有限环境下重症监护的简易死亡率预测模型:对改良早期预警评分和快速急诊医学评分的洞察
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;8(3):199-201. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_15_18.