Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后食管癌患者实施加速康复外科的可行性研究。

Feasibility research of enhanced recovery after surgery implemented in esophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul 25;20(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02701-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a perioperative management protocol to accelerate patient recovery. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of ERAS protocols implemented in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared the short-term clinical outcomes in esophagectomy patients from June 2018 to June 2021. Subjects were divided into two categories: those who underwent NACT (NACT group) and the non-NACT group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in total postoperative complication morbidity between the NACT and non-NACT groups (21.2% vs. 20.7%, P=0.936). In addition, the hospital length of stay post-surgery (7.90 vs. 7.71 days, P=0.424) was not significantly longer when compared to the non-NACT group. The time to chest tube removal (5.37 vs. 5.13 days, P=0.238) and first bowel movement (2.92 vs. 3.01 days, P=0.560) was also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in postoperative complications rate, postoperative hospital length of stay, and readmission rate between the two group. This study proved that ERAS protocols seemed to be safe and feasible for patients who received NACT before esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

术后加速康复(ERAS)是一种围手术期管理方案,旨在加速患者康复。本研究旨在评估在接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后行微创 McKeown 食管切除术患者中实施 ERAS 方案的可行性。

方法

本回顾性研究比较了 2018 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月间接受食管切除术患者的短期临床结局。将患者分为两组:接受 NACT(NACT 组)和未接受 NACT 组。

结果

NACT 组和非 NACT 组的总术后并发症发病率无显著差异(21.2% vs. 20.7%,P=0.936)。此外,与非 NACT 组相比,术后住院时间(7.90 天 vs. 7.71 天,P=0.424)并无显著延长。胸腔引流管拔除时间(5.37 天 vs. 5.13 天,P=0.238)和首次排气时间(2.92 天 vs. 3.01 天,P=0.560)也相似。

结论

两组患者的术后并发症发生率、术后住院时间和再入院率无显著差异。本研究证明,对于接受 NACT 后行食管切除术的患者,ERAS 方案似乎是安全可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/393b/9310402/08051e33535e/12957_2022_2701_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验