Suppr超能文献

新辅助放化疗后微创食管切除术的可靠性和安全性:一项回顾性研究

Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Liu Guangyuan, Han Yongtao, Peng Lin, Wang Kangning, Fan Yu

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.55, Section4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, No.55, Section4, South Renmi Road, Chengdu, 610041, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 28;14(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0920-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracic surgeons have recognized the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, MIE for locally advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is controversial. This study aimed to nvestigate and summarise the reliability and safety of MIE after NCRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from January 2016 to January 2018, and compared them with patients who underwent MIE alone during the same period.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients were eligible for the study. Forty-four patients underwent MIE after NCRT (CRM), and 63 patients underwent MIE alone (MA). The surgical duration (253.59 ± 47.51 vs. 222.86 ± 42.86 min), intraoperative blood loss (164.55 ± 109.09 vs. 146.19 ± 112.89 ml), number of lymph nodes resected (18.36 ± 8.01 vs. 22.10 ± 12.03), duration of the postoperative hospital stay (12.84 ± 6.57 vs. 14.60 ± 8.48 days), postoperative intubation time (5.68 ± 3.08 vs. 6.54 ± 4.97 days), total incidence of complications (34.10% vs. 31.7%), and R0 resection rate (95.45% vs. 96.83%) had no significant difference. The incidence of arrhythmia was higher in CRM (P < 0.02). No mortality occurred postoperatively within 30 days in either group.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a feasible, safe, and beneficial for postoperative recovery of patients.

摘要

背景

胸外科医生已经认识到微创食管切除术(MIE)的优势。然而,新辅助放化疗(NCRT)后行MIE治疗局部晚期食管癌仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨并总结NCRT后行MIE的可靠性和安全性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2018年1月期间接受新辅助放化疗后行微创食管切除术的局部晚期食管癌患者的围手术期结局,并将其与同期单纯行MIE的患者进行比较。

结果

共有107例患者符合研究条件。44例患者在NCRT后行MIE(CRM组),63例患者单纯行MIE(MA组)。两组患者的手术时间(253.59±47.51 vs. 222.86±42.86分钟)、术中出血量(164.55±109.09 vs. 146.19±112.89毫升)、切除淋巴结数量(18.36±8.01 vs. 22.10±12.03)、术后住院时间(12.84±6.57 vs. 14.60±8.48天)、术后插管时间(5.68±3.08 vs. 6.54±4.97天)、并发症总发生率(34.10% vs. 31.7%)和R0切除率(95.45% vs. 96.83%)均无显著差异。CRM组心律失常发生率更高(P<0.02)。两组术后30天内均无死亡病例。

结论

新辅助放化疗后行微创食管切除术对患者术后恢复是可行、安全且有益的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c514/6537410/1df5f60e65f0/13019_2019_920_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验