Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N Michigan Avenue, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 25;22(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01911-9.
Parents who have to make tracheostomy decisions for their critically ill child may face forecasting errors and wish to learn from peer parents. We sought to develop an intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents anticipate and prepare for future challenges before making a decision.
To ensure that the intervention reflects parents' needs (rather than experts' opinions), we adapted a user-centered design (UCD) process to identify decision-critical information and refine the presentation format by interviewing parents who had tracheostomy decision making experience. Phase 1 (n = 10) presented 15 possible forecasting errors and asked participants to prioritize and justify the problematic ones. It also asked participants to comment on the draft narratives and preferred delivery mode and time of the intervention. Phase 2 (n = 9 additional parents and 1 previous parent) iteratively collected feedback over four waves of user interviews to guide revisions to the informational booklet.
Phase 1 revealed that parents wanted information to address all forecasting errors as soon as tracheostomy becomes an option. They also highlighted diverse family situations and the importance of offering management strategies. The resulting prototype booklet contained five sections: introduction, child's quality of life, home care, practical challenges, and resources. Feedback from Phase 2 focused on emphasizing individualized situations, personal choice, seriousness of the decision, and caregiver health as well as presenting concrete illustrations of future challenges with acknowledgement of positive outcomes and advice. We also learned that parents preferred to use the booklet with support from the care team rather than read it alone.
A UCD process enabled inclusion of parental perspectives that were initially overlooked and tailoring of the intervention to meet parental expectations. Similar UCD-based approaches may be valuable in the design of other types of patient communications (e.g., decision aids).
需要为重病孩子做出气管切开术决策的父母可能会面临预测错误,并希望向有经验的同行父母学习。我们试图开发一种包含同行父母叙述的干预措施,以帮助父母在做出决策之前预测和准备未来的挑战。
为了确保干预措施反映父母的需求(而不是专家的意见),我们采用了以用户为中心的设计(UCD)过程,通过采访有气管切开术决策经验的父母,确定决策关键信息并改进演示格式。第 1 阶段(n=10)提出了 15 种可能的预测错误,并要求参与者对有问题的错误进行优先级排序和证明。它还要求参与者对草案叙述和干预措施的首选交付模式和时间发表评论。第 2 阶段(n=9 位额外的父母和 1 位之前的父母)通过四轮用户访谈,不断收集反馈意见,指导信息手册的修订。
第 1 阶段表明,父母希望在气管切开术成为选择时,尽快获得解决所有预测错误的信息。他们还强调了不同的家庭情况和提供管理策略的重要性。由此产生的原型手册包含五个部分:介绍、孩子的生活质量、家庭护理、实际挑战和资源。第 2 阶段的反馈重点强调了个性化情况、个人选择、决策的严重性以及照顾者的健康,以及呈现未来挑战的具体示例,同时承认积极的结果和建议。我们还了解到,父母更喜欢在护理团队的支持下使用手册,而不是独自阅读。
UCD 过程使父母的观点得以纳入,这些观点最初被忽视,并根据父母的期望对干预措施进行了调整。类似的基于 UCD 的方法可能在设计其他类型的患者沟通(例如,决策辅助工具)方面具有价值。