Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):523-533. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac100.
Effective deprescribing requires shared decision making between a patient and their clinician, and should be used when implementing evidence-based deprescribing conversations. As part of the Shed-MEDS clinical trial, this study assessed barriers and enablers that influence patient decision making in deprescribing to inform future implementation efforts and adaptations.
Shed-MEDS, a randomized controlled deprescribing trial, included hospitalized older adults discharging to post-acute care facilities. A trained clinician reviewed each participant's medical history and medication list to identify medications with potential for deprescribing. The study clinician then conducted a semistructured patient-centered deprescribing interview to determine patient (or surrogate) concerns about medications and willingness to deprescribe. Reeve et al.'s (2013) framework was used to categorize barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective, including "appropriateness of cessation," "fear," "dislike of a medication," "influences," and "process of cessation."
Overall, participants/surrogates (N = 177) agreed with 63% (883 total medications) of the study clinician's deprescribing recommendations. Thematic analysis revealed that "appropriateness" of a medication was the most common barrier (88.2%) and enabler (67.3%) to deprescribing. Other deprescribing enablers were in the following domains: "influences" (22.7%), "process" (22.5%), "pragmatic" (19.4%), and "dislike" (5.3%).
Use of a semistructured deprescribing interview conversation tool allowed study clinicians to elicit individual barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective. Participants in this study expressed more agreement than disagreement with study clinicians' deprescribing recommendations. These results should inform future implementation efforts that incorporate a patient-centered framework during deprescribing conversations.
NCT02979353.
有效的减药需要患者和临床医生共同做出决策,并且应该在实施基于证据的减药对话时使用。作为 Shed-MEDS 临床试验的一部分,本研究评估了影响患者在减药决策中的障碍和促进因素,以为未来的实施工作和调整提供信息。
Shed-MEDS 是一项随机对照减药试验,纳入了出院到康复护理机构的老年住院患者。一名经过培训的临床医生审查了每位参与者的病史和药物清单,以确定可能需要减药的药物。然后,研究临床医生进行了半结构化的以患者为中心的减药访谈,以确定患者(或代理人)对药物的担忧和减药意愿。Reeve 等人(2013 年)的框架用于从患者的角度对减药的障碍和促进因素进行分类,包括“停药的适当性”、“恐惧”、“对药物的不喜欢”、“影响”和“停药过程”。
总体而言,参与者/代理人(N=177)同意研究临床医生的 63%(883 种总药物)减药建议。主题分析显示,药物“适当性”是减药的最常见障碍(88.2%)和促进因素(67.3%)。其他减药促进因素包括:“影响”(22.7%)、“过程”(22.5%)、“实用”(19.4%)和“不喜欢”(5.3%)。
使用半结构化的减药访谈对话工具使研究临床医生能够从患者的角度引出个体的减药障碍和促进因素。本研究的参与者对研究临床医生的减药建议表示更多的同意而不是不同意。这些结果应该为未来的实施工作提供信息,即在减药对话中纳入以患者为中心的框架。
NCT02979353。