• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对减药的阻碍因素和促进因素:系统评价。

Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.

机构信息

Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia,

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0106-8.

DOI:10.1007/s40266-013-0106-8
PMID:23912674
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate medication use is common in the elderly and the risks associated with their use are well known. The term deprescribing has been utilised to describe the complex process that is required for the safe and effective cessation of inappropriate medications. Given the primacy of the consumer in health care, their views must be central in the development of any deprescribing process.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers that may influence a patient's decision to cease a medication.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit and Scopus was conducted and augmented with a manual search. Numerous search terms relating to withdrawal of medications and consumers' beliefs were utilised.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Articles were included if the barriers or enablers were directly patient/carer reported and related to long-term medication(s) that they were currently taking or had recently ceased.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Determination of relevance and data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Content analysis with coding was utilised for synthesis of results.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Three themes, disagreement/agreement with 'appropriateness' of cessation, absence/presence of a 'process' for cessation, and negative/positive 'influences' to cease medication, were identified as both potential barriers and enablers, with 'fear' of cessation and 'dislike' of medications as a fourth barrier and enabler, respectively. The most common barrier/enabler identified was 'appropriateness' of cessation, with 15 studies identifying this as a barrier and 18 as an enabler.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

The decision to stop a medication by an individual is influenced by multiple competing barriers and enablers. Knowledge of these will aid in the development of a deprescribing process, particularly in approaching the topic of cessation with the patient and what process should be utilised. However, further research is required to determine if the proposed patient-centred deprescribing process will result in improved patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

老年人中普遍存在用药不当的情况,且人们对其相关风险已有充分认识。“撤药”一词被用于描述安全有效停止使用不适当药物所需的复杂过程。鉴于患者在医疗保健中的首要地位,他们的意见必须成为任何撤药过程的核心。

目的

本研究旨在确定可能影响患者停止用药决定的障碍和促进因素。

数据来源

对 MEDLINE、国际药学文摘、EMBASE、CINAHL、Informit 和 Scopus 进行了系统检索,并辅以手动检索。使用了与药物撤回和患者信念相关的大量检索词。

研究入选标准

如果障碍或促进因素是直接由患者/护理人员报告的,并且与他们正在服用或最近已停止的长期药物有关,则纳入研究。

研究评估和综合方法

两名评审员独立确定相关性并提取数据。采用内容分析法进行结果综合。

结果

有 21 篇文章符合标准并纳入综述。确定了三个主题,即停止用药的“适当性”的意见分歧/一致、停止用药“过程”的存在/缺失,以及停止用药的“负面影响”/积极影响,这些既是潜在的障碍也是促进因素,“对停药的恐惧”和“对药物的厌恶”分别是第四大障碍和促进因素。最常见的障碍/促进因素是停止用药的“适当性”,有 15 项研究认为这是一个障碍,18 项研究认为这是一个促进因素。

结论和关键发现的意义

个体停止用药的决定受到多种相互竞争的障碍和促进因素的影响。了解这些因素将有助于开发撤药流程,特别是在与患者讨论停药问题以及应采用何种流程时。然而,需要进一步研究来确定拟议的以患者为中心的撤药流程是否会改善患者结局。

相似文献

1
Patient barriers to and enablers of deprescribing: a systematic review.患者对减药的阻碍因素和促进因素:系统评价。
Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0106-8.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
10
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Medicine Preferences of Older Adults: The Role of Messaging in a Multi-Methods Experimental Survey.了解老年人的医学偏好:多方法实验性调查中信息传递的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70366. doi: 10.1111/hex.70366.
2
Acceptability of Interventions to Address Polypharmacy in Older Adult Outpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年门诊患者多重用药干预措施的可接受性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 31;8(8):e70981. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70981. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
A Pathway to Healthier Aging or an Illusion? A Narrative Review on Deprescribing Protocols for the Elderly.

本文引用的文献

1
A pilot randomized controlled trial of deprescribing.一项药物减量的初步随机对照试验。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;2(2):37-43. doi: 10.1177/2042098611400332.
2
People's attitudes, beliefs, and experiences regarding polypharmacy and willingness to Deprescribe.人们对多药治疗的态度、信念和经验,以及对减药的意愿。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Sep;61(9):1508-14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12418. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
3
Development and validation of the patients' attitudes towards deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire.开发和验证患者对减药态度(PATD)问卷。
通往健康老龄化之路还是一种幻想?关于老年人减药方案的叙述性综述
Sage Open Aging. 2025 Jun 9;11:30495334251345091. doi: 10.1177/30495334251345091. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Interventions to Address Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing for Older Primary Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针对老年初级保健患者潜在不适当处方的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517965. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17965.
5
Joint Clinical Practice Guideline on Benzodiazepine Tapering: Considerations When Risks Outweigh Benefits.苯二氮䓬类药物减药联合临床实践指南:风险大于益处时的考量
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09499-2.
6
Facilitators of and Barriers to Deprescribing Diabetes Medications in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.老年人停用糖尿病药物的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2447-2456. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19550. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
7
Education about deprescribing for pre-licensed and licensed healthcare professionals: A scoping review.针对未取得执照和已取得执照的医疗保健专业人员的减药教育:一项范围综述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun;91(6):1649-1659. doi: 10.1111/bcp.70040.
8
Description of barriers to the deprescription of inappropriate drugs in French hospitalized geriatric services.法国老年住院服务中停用不适当药物的障碍描述。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 15;15(1):16837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99752-9.
9
To prescribe or not to prescribe in the elderly: a qualitative exploration of prescribing dilemmas among Pakistani healthcare providers.为老年人开药方与否:对巴基斯坦医疗服务提供者开方困境的定性探索
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 29;15(4):e094545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094545.
10
Development of a complex multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention in primary care for older people living with frailty and polypharmacy.为患有衰弱和多重用药的老年人开展一项复杂的多学科药物评估与减药干预的初级保健项目。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 22;20(4):e0319615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319615. eCollection 2025.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Feb;35(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9704-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
4
Deprescribing medication in very elderly patients with multimorbidity: the view of Dutch GPs. A qualitative study.非常高龄且多病共存的患者减停药:荷兰全科医生的观点。一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jul 9;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-56.
5
Inappropriate prescribing: criteria, detection and prevention.不适当处方:标准、检测和预防。
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):437-52. doi: 10.2165/11632610-000000000-00000.
6
Deprescribing trials: methods to reduce polypharmacy and the impact on prescribing and clinical outcomes.减药试验:减少多种药物并用的方法,以及对处方和临床结果的影响。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):237-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
7
Minimizing inappropriate medications in older populations: a 10-step conceptual framework.最小化老年人群体中不适当的药物使用:一个 10 步的概念框架。
Am J Med. 2012 Jun;125(6):529-37.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.09.021. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
8
Knowing how to stop: ceasing prescribing when the medicine is no longer required.知道如何停药:当药物不再需要时停止开药。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):68-72. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.1.68.
9
Inappropriate medication use among the elderly: a systematic review of administrative databases.老年人用药不当:行政数据库的系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2011 Nov 30;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-11-79.
10
Revised guidelines for cardiovascular risk management - time to stop medication? A practice-based intervention study.心血管风险管理指南修订——是否需要停止药物治疗?一项基于实践的干预研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jun;61(587):e347-52. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X578025.