Balogh A
Acta Med Hung. 1986;43(2):97-102.
Clinical effectiveness and side effects of a biphasic oral hormonal contraceptive preparation (levonorgestrel /LNG/ 10 X 0.05 mg+ + 11 X 0.125 mg, ethinyl oestradiol /EO/ 21 X 0.05 mg) were compared with the effect of a classical high fixed dose combination pill (LNG 21 X 0.25 mg, EO 21 X 0.05 mg). The biphasic pill was used by 121 women during 1844 cycles, while the fixed dose pill was used by 142 women during 1940 cycles. In the comparison with the life table method, termination of pill use for medical reasons and loss to follow up proved to be significantly different in favour of the biphasic pill.
将一种双相口服激素避孕药制剂(左炔诺孕酮/LNG/10片×0.05毫克++11片×0.125毫克,炔雌醇/EO/21片×0.05毫克)的临床效果及副作用与一种传统高固定剂量复方避孕药(LNG 21片×0.25毫克,EO 21片×0.05毫克)的效果进行了比较。121名女性在1844个周期中使用了双相避孕药,而142名女性在1940个周期中使用了固定剂量避孕药。与寿命表法比较发现,因医学原因停药及失访情况在双相避孕药组明显更有利。