• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左炔诺孕酮和炔雌醇以一种三相(Trionetta)和一种单相(Neovletta)剂型给药时的避孕可接受性比较。

Comparison of contraceptive acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta) and one monophasic (Neovletta) version.

作者信息

Carlborg L

出版信息

Contraception. 1983 May;27(5):439-52. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(83)90041-0.

DOI:10.1016/0010-7824(83)90041-0
PMID:6349925
Abstract

In a Swedish multicenter study, a total number of 835 women completed a total of 6472 treatment cycles. Half of them were allotted at random to use the monophasic oral contraceptive Neovletta, also known as Microgynon 30 (30 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol + 150 micrograms levonorgestrel in each tablet). The second half was allotted to Trionetta, also known as Triquilar, Trigynon and Logynon (6 tablets with 30 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol + 50 micrograms levonorgestrel, 5 tablets with 40 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol + 75 micrograms levonorgestrel and 10 tablets with 30 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol + 125 micrograms levonorgestrel). The latter version was also present in a 28-day version containing in addition 7 "placebo" tablets to be used in the otherwise tablet-free interval. The contraceptive reliability was excellent although one pregnancy occurred in the three-phase version. It could be attributed to patient failure. In all aspects of bleeding control, the three-phasic pill proved to be superior to the reference monophasic preparation. The extreme low incidence of missed withdrawal bleeding and stability already during the first months of use are noteworthy features. For both preparations, continuation rate was at six months of use about 85% and at 12 months it was a similar figure. The most common reason for withdrawal was bleeding, about 5% each for both preparation. No serious side-effects were reported. The study clearly indicates that the three-phasic version is a major improvement in spite of a considerably decreased total dose of the gestagen.

摘要

在一项瑞典多中心研究中,共有835名女性完成了总计6472个治疗周期。其中一半被随机分配使用单相口服避孕药Neovletta,也称为Microgynon 30(每片含30微克炔雌醇+150微克左炔诺孕酮)。另一半被分配使用Trionetta,也称为Triquilar、Trigynon和Logynon(6片含30微克炔雌醇+50微克左炔诺孕酮,5片含40微克炔雌醇+75微克左炔诺孕酮,10片含30微克炔雌醇+125微克左炔诺孕酮)。后一种版本还有28天的剂型,在原本无药的间隔期还额外含有7片“安慰剂”片。尽管三相剂型发生了1例妊娠,但避孕可靠性极佳。这可能归因于患者使用不当。在出血控制的各个方面,三相片均被证明优于对照单相制剂。值得注意的是,漏服撤退性出血的发生率极低,且在使用的头几个月就已表现出稳定性。两种制剂在使用6个月时的持续使用率约为85%,12个月时的数字相近。停药的最常见原因是出血,两种制剂的停药率均约为5%。未报告严重副作用。该研究清楚地表明,尽管孕激素的总剂量大幅降低,但三相剂型仍是一项重大改进。

相似文献

1
Comparison of contraceptive acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta) and one monophasic (Neovletta) version.左炔诺孕酮和炔雌醇以一种三相(Trionetta)和一种单相(Neovletta)剂型给药时的避孕可接受性比较。
Contraception. 1983 May;27(5):439-52. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(83)90041-0.
2
Comparative metabolic effects of three types of combined oral contraceptive pills in Chinese women.三种复方口服避孕药对中国女性的代谢影响比较
Contraception. 1989 Jan;39(1):21-35. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(89)90013-9.
3
Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol.两种口服避孕药制剂的可靠性、周期控制及副作用比较概况,这两种制剂含150微克去氧孕烯及30微克或20微克炔雌醇。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Sep;100(9):832-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14309.x.
4
The effect of deliberate omission of Trinordiol or Microgynon on the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis.故意停用复方炔诺酮或妈富隆对下丘脑-垂体-卵巢轴的影响。
Contraception. 1986 Nov;34(5):513-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90060-0.
5
Clinical experience with a triphasic oral contraceptive ('Trinordiol') in young women.年轻女性使用三相口服避孕药(“Trinordiol”)的临床经验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(6):395-404. doi: 10.1185/03007998309111745.
6
A clinical comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethindrone: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.两种含左炔诺孕酮或炔诺酮的三相口服避孕药的临床比较:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Contraception. 1993 Jan;47(1):43-54. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90108-j.
7
Comparison of metabolic and clinical effects of four oral contraceptive formulations and a contraceptive vaginal ring.四种口服避孕药配方与一种避孕阴道环的代谢及临床效果比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Apr 1;136(7):920-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)91052-2.
8
A multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over six treatment cycles.一项多中心、非对照临床研究,旨在评估一种含20微克炔雌醇和100微克左炔诺孕酮的新型低剂量口服避孕药在六个治疗周期中的避孕效果、月经周期控制情况及安全性。
Contraception. 1997 Nov;56(5):285-90. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00157-1.
9
Comparative study on the efficacy and acceptability of two contraceptive pills administered by the vaginal route: an international multicenter clinical trial.两种经阴道给药避孕药的疗效和可接受性比较研究:一项国际多中心临床试验。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Jan;53(1):65-75. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1993.10.
10
Postponement of withdrawal bleeding in women using low-dose combined oral contraceptives.使用低剂量复方口服避孕药的女性撤退性出血延迟
Contraception. 1987 Mar;35(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90022-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.三相口服避孕药与单相口服避孕药用于避孕的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;2011(11):CD003553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003553.pub3.