• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情改变了海洋保护区内外的非法捕鱼活动。

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered illegal fishing activities inside and outside a marine protected area.

机构信息

Centro de Biologia Marinha, Universidade de São Paulo, São Sebastião, SP 11612-109, Brazil; Tennenbaum Marine Observatories Network and MarineGEO Program, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD 20764, USA.

Lab. Macroecologia e Biogeografia Marinha, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC 88040-090, Brazil.

出版信息

Curr Biol. 2022 Jul 25;32(14):R765-R766. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.030.

DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.030
PMID:35882192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9310233/
Abstract

The global COVID-19 pandemic has presented a unique opportunity to explore the consequences of illegal exploitation on wildlife communities, as it continues to have wide-reaching impacts on multiple sectors, including local and national economies, international trade, and conservation enforcement. The ongoing reductions in monitoring and enforcement during the pandemic have allowed increased opportunities for illegal, unreported, and unregulated activities, particularly for small-scale fisheries. Even before the pandemic, policymakers and fisheries managers intent on controlling illegal fishing activities established marine protected areas (MPAs) that restrict or prohibit fishing. Unfortunately, non-compliance with MPAs is often the rule rather than the exception, and less than 10% of the world's MPAs have managed to effectively reduce infringement. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these management challenges: a recent review of MPAs worldwide has revealed a general decline in tourism revenue to operate park services during the pandemic, especially revenue needed for supporting personnel to monitor, patrol, and enforce restrictions. Here, we compile infraction records of illegal fishing activities by both professional (commercial) and amateur (recreational) boats inside and outside of the Tupinambás Ecological Station and the Alcatrazes Wildlife Refuge (Figure 1A), notable for its high reef-fish biomass and diversity in the Southwestern Atlantic. We show that illegal exploitation has shifted since the onset of the pandemic, targeting larger, higher-value species that contribute disproportionately to the structure and function of reef-fish communities in the region.

摘要

全球 COVID-19 大流行为探索非法开发对野生动物群落的后果提供了一个独特的机会,因为它继续对多个部门产生广泛影响,包括地方和国家经济、国际贸易和保护执法。大流行期间监测和执法的持续减少为非法、未报告和不受管制的活动提供了更多机会,特别是对于小规模渔业。即使在大流行之前,有意控制非法捕鱼活动的政策制定者和渔业管理人员也建立了海洋保护区 (MPAs),限制或禁止捕鱼。不幸的是,不遵守 MPA 通常是常态而不是例外,世界上不到 10%的 MPA 成功地有效减少了侵权行为。COVID-19 大流行加剧了这些管理挑战:最近对全球 MPA 的审查显示,大流行期间运营公园服务的旅游收入普遍下降,特别是需要人员来监测、巡逻和执行限制的人员的收入。在这里,我们整理了在 Tupinambás 生态站和 Alcatrazes 野生动物保护区内外非法捕鱼活动的违规记录(图 1A),该保护区以西南大西洋高珊瑚鱼生物量和多样性为特征。我们表明,自大流行开始以来,非法开发的目标已经转移,针对的是体型更大、价值更高的物种,这些物种对该地区珊瑚鱼群落的结构和功能不成比例地做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/9310233/ecd57e0d6917/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/9310233/ecd57e0d6917/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d8/9310233/ecd57e0d6917/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered illegal fishing activities inside and outside a marine protected area.新冠疫情改变了海洋保护区内外的非法捕鱼活动。
Curr Biol. 2022 Jul 25;32(14):R765-R766. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.030.
2
Decreased tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic positively affects reef fish in a high use marine protected area.新冠疫情大流行期间旅游减少对高利用海洋保护区的珊瑚鱼产生积极影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0283683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283683. eCollection 2023.
3
Long-term effectiveness of a multi-use marine protected area on reef fish assemblages and fisheries landings.多用途海洋保护区对珊瑚鱼群落和渔业捕捞量的长期影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Mar 15;117:276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.029. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
4
Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.实施海洋保护区网络后捕捞和非捕捞努力的再分配驱动因素。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Mar;27(2):416-428. doi: 10.1002/eap.1446. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
5
A Biophysical and Economic Profile of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands as Potential Large-Scale Antarctic Protected Areas.南乔治亚岛和南桑威奇群岛作为潜在大规模南极保护区的生物物理与经济概况
Adv Mar Biol. 2015;70:1-286. doi: 10.1016/bs.amb.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
Coastal radar as a tool for continuous and fine-scale monitoring of vessel activities of interest in the vicinity of marine protected areas.沿海雷达作为一种工具,可用于在海洋保护区附近连续、精细地监测感兴趣的船只活动。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0269490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269490. eCollection 2022.
7
Starting point or solution? Community-based marine protected areas in the Philippines.起点还是解决方案?菲律宾基于社区的海洋保护区
J Environ Manage. 2002 Dec;66(4):441-54. doi: 10.1006/jema.2002.0595.
8
Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas.渔业限制和海洋保护区内珊瑚礁鱼类的生物量增长。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Apr;32(2):401-410. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12996. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Changes in illegal fishing dynamics in a large-scale MPA during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间大型海洋保护区非法捕鱼动态的变化。
Curr Biol. 2023 Aug 21;33(16):R851-R852. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.076.
10
Impact of pre-closure fishing effort on marine protected area performance in social-ecological dimensions: Implications for developing marine conservation plans.封海前捕捞努力对海洋保护区在社会-生态层面表现的影响:对制定海洋保护计划的启示。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:138936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138936. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
How the COVID-19 pandemic signaled the demise of Antarctic exceptionalism.新冠疫情如何标志着南极例外论的终结。
Sci Adv. 2024 Mar;10(9):eadk4424. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk4424. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment.全球新冠疫情封锁凸显出人类既是环境的威胁者又是守护者。
Biol Conserv. 2021 Nov;263:109175. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109175. Epub 2021 May 20.
2
COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a "Global Human Confinement Experiment" to investigate biodiversity conservation.将新冠疫情及相关封锁作为一项“全球人类限制实验”以研究生物多样性保护。
Biol Conserv. 2020 Aug;248:108665. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108665. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Spatial patterns of fish standing biomass across Brazilian reefs.
巴西珊瑚礁鱼类现存生物量的空间分布格局。
J Fish Biol. 2017 Dec;91(6):1642-1667. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13482. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
4
Understanding and managing compliance in the nature conservation context.理解和管理自然保护背景下的合规性。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Apr 15;153:134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
5
Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change.相位变化、食草作用与珊瑚礁对气候变化的恢复力
Curr Biol. 2007 Feb 20;17(4):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.049. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
6
Ecology. Coral reefs and the global network of Marine Protected Areas.生态学。珊瑚礁与海洋保护区全球网络
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1750-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1125295.
7
Confronting the coral reef crisis.应对珊瑚礁危机。
Nature. 2004 Jun 24;429(6994):827-33. doi: 10.1038/nature02691.