• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保护基础设施性能免受虚假信息攻击。

Protecting infrastructure performance from disinformation attacks.

机构信息

School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.

School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 26;12(1):12707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16832-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-16832-w
PMID:35882902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9325778/
Abstract

Disinformation campaigns are prevalent, affecting vaccination coverage, creating uncertainty in election results, and causing supply chain disruptions, among others. Unfortunately, the problems of misinformation and disinformation are exacerbated due to the wide availability of online platforms and social networks. Naturally, these emerging disinformation networks could lead users to engage with critical infrastructure systems in harmful ways, leading to broader adverse impacts. One such example involves the spread of false pricing information, which causes drastic and sudden changes in user commodity consumption behavior, leading to shortages. Given this, it is critical to address the following related questions: (i) How can we monitor the evolution of disinformation dissemination and its projected impacts on commodity consumption? (ii) What effects do the mitigation efforts of human intermediaries have on the performance of the infrastructure network subject to disinformation campaigns? (iii) How can we manage infrastructure network operations and counter disinformation in concert to avoid shortages and satisfy user demands? To answer these questions, we develop a hybrid approach that integrates an epidemiological model of disinformation spread (based on a susceptible-infectious-recovered model, or SIR) with an efficient mixed-integer programming optimization model for infrastructure network performance. The goal of the optimization model is to determine the best protection and response actions against disinformation to minimize the general shortage of commodities at different nodes over time. The proposed model is illustrated with a case study involving a subset of the western US interconnection grid located in Los Angeles County in California.

摘要

虚假信息宣传活动泛滥,影响疫苗接种率,导致选举结果出现不确定性,并造成供应链中断等后果。不幸的是,由于在线平台和社交网络的广泛普及,错误信息和虚假信息的问题更加严重。自然而然,这些新兴的虚假信息网络可能会导致用户以有害的方式参与关键基础设施系统,从而导致更广泛的不利影响。一个这样的例子涉及虚假定价信息的传播,这导致用户商品消费行为急剧和突然变化,导致短缺。考虑到这一点,解决以下相关问题至关重要:(i)我们如何监测虚假信息传播的演变及其对商品消费的预计影响?(ii)人为中介的缓解措施对受虚假信息宣传活动影响的基础设施网络性能有何影响?(iii)我们如何协调基础设施网络运营和对抗虚假信息,以避免短缺并满足用户需求?为了回答这些问题,我们开发了一种混合方法,该方法将虚假信息传播的流行病学模型(基于易感-感染-恢复模型或 SIR)与基础设施网络性能的高效混合整数规划优化模型相结合。优化模型的目标是确定针对虚假信息的最佳保护和应对措施,以最大限度地减少不同节点的商品总体短缺。该模型通过涉及加利福尼亚州洛杉矶县的美国西部互联电网子集的案例研究进行说明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/04b4caeebce0/41598_2022_16832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/ec5c76d4186e/41598_2022_16832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/57ac887a3796/41598_2022_16832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/04b4caeebce0/41598_2022_16832_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/ec5c76d4186e/41598_2022_16832_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/57ac887a3796/41598_2022_16832_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d9/9325778/04b4caeebce0/41598_2022_16832_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Protecting infrastructure performance from disinformation attacks.保护基础设施性能免受虚假信息攻击。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 26;12(1):12707. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16832-w.
2
How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city's power grid.将虚假信息武器化如何能使一座城市的电网瘫痪。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236517. eCollection 2020.
3
Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks.自动检测虚假信息网络中的有影响力的行为者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2011216118.
4
Disinformation and Epidemics: Anticipating the Next Phase of Biowarfare.虚假信息与传染病:生物战的下一阶段。
Health Secur. 2021 Jan-Feb;19(1):3-12. doi: 10.1089/hs.2020.0038. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media.对与信仰一致的虚假信息持道德宽容态度,可能有助于解释其在社交媒体上的传播。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0281777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281777. eCollection 2023.
6
Misinformation and Disinformation: The Potential Disadvantages of Social Media in Infectious Disease and How to Combat Them.错误信息和虚假信息:社交媒体在传染病方面的潜在劣势,以及如何应对这些劣势。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 15;74(Suppl_3):e34-e39. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac109.
7
Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic.心理疫苗可预防社交媒体信息疫情。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 8;13(1):5780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32962-1.
8
[Mis- and disinformation in social media: mitigating risks in digital health communication].[社交媒体中的错误信息和虚假信息:减轻数字健康传播中的风险]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):300-307. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03836-2. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
9
Detecting fake news and disinformation using artificial intelligence and machine learning to avoid supply chain disruptions.利用人工智能和机器学习检测假新闻和虚假信息以避免供应链中断。
Ann Oper Res. 2022 Nov 1:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10479-022-05015-5.
10
A scoping review of COVID-19 online mis/disinformation in Black communities.一项针对 COVID-19 在线错误/虚假信息在黑人群体中的范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2022 Jul 23;12:05026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.05026.

引用本文的文献

1
Mathematical modeling of disinformation and effectiveness of mitigation policies.虚假信息的数学建模及缓解政策的有效性
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):18735. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45710-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the news and its impact on democracy.衡量新闻及其对民主的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912443118.
2
Traffic networks are vulnerable to disinformation attacks.交通网络容易受到虚假信息攻击。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 5;11(1):5329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84291-w.
3
How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city's power grid.将虚假信息武器化如何能使一座城市的电网瘫痪。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0236517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236517. eCollection 2020.
4
Evaluating and Visualizing the Economic Impact of Commercial Districts Due to an Electric Power Network Disruption.评估和可视化因电网中断对商业区的经济影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Sep;39(9):2032-2053. doi: 10.1111/risa.13372. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
6
Epidemic model for information diffusion in web forums: experiments in marketing exchange and political dialog.
Springerplus. 2016 Jan 22;5:66. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1675-x. eCollection 2016.
7
Immunization against the Spread of Rumors in Homogenous Networks.同质网络中谣言传播的免疫
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0124978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124978. eCollection 2015.
8
Networks and epidemic models.网络与流行病模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2005 Sep 22;2(4):295-307. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2005.0051.