Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Measuring the news and its impact on democracy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912443118.
2
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 3;6(14):eaay3539. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3539. eCollection 2020 Apr.
5
Fake News: A Technological Approach to Proving the Origins of Content, Using Blockchains.
Big Data. 2017 Dec;5(4):356-371. doi: 10.1089/big.2017.0071.
6
Fake News: Spread of Misinformation about Urological Conditions on Social Media.
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):437-439. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Conscientiousness does not moderate the association between political ideology and susceptibility to fake news sharing.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Nov;152(11):3277-3284. doi: 10.1037/xge0001467. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
9
Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):904-916. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
Supersharers of fake news on Twitter.
Science. 2024 May 31;384(6699):979-982. doi: 10.1126/science.adl4435. Epub 2024 May 30.

引用本文的文献

2
Highly engaging events reveal semantic and temporal compression in online community discourse.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 24;4(3):pgaf056. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf056. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Large-scale analysis of fact-checked stories on Twitter reveals graded effects of ambiguity and falsehood on information reappearance.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 19;4(2):pgaf028. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf028. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Human detection of political speech deepfakes across transcripts, audio, and video.
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 2;15(1):7629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51998-z.
6
Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Aug;8(8):1545-1553. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01884-x. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
Reflecting on Indonesia's young academy movement.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 23;121(17):e2307213121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307213121. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
8
Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0294735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294735. eCollection 2024.
9
The unequal landscape of civic opportunity in America.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Feb;8(2):256-263. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01743-1. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
10
Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search.
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7964):342-348. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06078-5. Epub 2023 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction to the Special Collection on the Fragile Families Challenge.
Socius. 2019 Jan-Dec;5. doi: 10.1177/2378023119871580. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.
Sci Adv. 2020 Apr 3;6(14):eaay3539. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay3539. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Aug;149(8):1608-1613. doi: 10.1037/xge0000729. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
4
Protecting elections from social media manipulation.
Science. 2019 Aug 30;365(6456):858-861. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8243.
5
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2521-2526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
7
Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.
Sci Adv. 2019 Jan 9;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586. eCollection 2019 Jan.
8
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
9
Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12435-12440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803470115. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
10
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9216-9221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804840115. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验