Department on Aging, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Alzheimer Center Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
JMIR Aging. 2024 Sep 13;7:e53640. doi: 10.2196/53640.
Despite positive results for the use of assistive technologies (ATs) in dementia, the uptake of ATs lags behind. It is considered important to assess determinants of successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs.
We explored factors that influence the implementation of ATs for community-dwelling people with dementia, with the aim to better understand potentially effective implementation strategies.
A cross-sectional survey for researchers was developed and disseminated, exploring factors that influence either successful or unsuccessful implementation of ATs for dementia. The survey consisted of closed and open questions.
The response rate was 10% (21/206); the 21 respondents who completed the survey were from 8 countries. Determinants of implementation were described for 21 ATs, of which 12 were successfully and 9 were unsuccessfully implemented. Various types of ATs were included, such as online platforms, sensors, or physical aids. The main determinants of implementation success were related to the AT itself, contextual factors, research activities, and implementation strategies. There was a lack of research data on some ethical issues and cost-effectiveness.
This study provided insight into some main barriers to and facilitators of implementation of ATs in dementia related to the AT itself, context, research-related activities, and applied implementation strategies. Lessons were formulated for various stakeholders to improve the implementation effectiveness of ATs in dementia.
尽管辅助技术(ATs)在痴呆症中的应用效果积极,但 ATs 的采用率却滞后。评估 ATs 成功或失败实施的决定因素被认为很重要。
我们探讨了影响社区居住的痴呆症患者使用 ATs 的因素,旨在更好地理解潜在有效的实施策略。
我们开发并分发了一项针对研究人员的横断面调查,以探讨影响 ATs 在痴呆症中成功或失败实施的因素。该调查包括封闭式和开放式问题。
响应率为 10%(21/206);完成调查的 21 名受访者来自 8 个国家。描述了 21 种 ATs 的实施决定因素,其中 12 种成功实施,9 种未成功实施。包括在线平台、传感器或物理辅助工具等各种类型的 ATs。实施成功的主要决定因素与 AT 本身、背景因素、研究活动和实施策略有关。关于一些伦理问题和成本效益的研究数据缺乏。
本研究深入了解了与 AT 本身、背景、研究相关活动和应用实施策略有关的一些实施 ATs 的主要障碍和促进因素。为各个利益相关者制定了一些经验教训,以提高痴呆症中 ATs 的实施效果。