Senior Public Health Intelligence Analyst, Medway Council, London, UK.
University of California, San Francisco, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, 3333 California St., Ste. 265, Box 0936, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;22(1):1421. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13786-6.
Persons who experience homelessness remain at increased risk for three viral blood-borne infections: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). We assessed the yield of testing and linkage to care programs targeting this population for these infections in the United States (US).
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for peer-reviewed articles through August 27, 2020. Additionally, we searched the grey literature. Two individuals independently reviewed all relevant studies to check for eligibility and extracted data for each step in the care cascade. We used random-effects model to generate weighted pooled proportions to assess yield at each step. Cumulative proportions were calculated as products of adjacent-step pooled proportions. We quantitatively synthesized data from the studies that focused on non-drug injecting individuals.
We identified 24 studies published between 1996-2019 conducted in 19 US states. Seventeen studies screened for HIV, 12 for HCV, and two screened for HBV. For HIV, 72% of approached were recruited, 64% had valid results, 4% tested positive, 2% were given results, and 1% were referred and attended follow-up. Of positives, 25% were referred to treatment and started care. For HCV, 69% of approached were recruited, 63% had valid results, 16% tested positive, 14% were given results, and 3% attended follow-up. Of positives, 30% were referred for treatment and 19% started care. The yield at each care cascade step differs widely by recruitment strategy (for example, for HIV: 71.6% recruited of reached under service-based with zero yield under healthcare facility-based and outreach).
A very large proportion of this population reached for HIV and HCV care were lost in the follow-up steps and never received treatment. Future programs should examine drop-out reasons and intervene to reduce health disparities in this population.
无家可归者仍然面临着三种病毒血液传播感染的风险增加:人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)。我们评估了美国(美国)针对这些感染对这一人群进行检测和联系护理计划的效果。
我们通过 2020 年 8 月 27 日在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Central 搜索了同行评审文章。此外,我们还搜索了灰色文献。两名研究人员独立审查了所有相关研究,以检查其资格,并提取了护理链中每个步骤的数据。我们使用随机效应模型生成加权汇总比例,以评估每个步骤的效果。累积比例是相邻步骤汇总比例的乘积。我们对重点关注非药物注射者的研究进行了数据定量综合分析。
我们确定了 1996 年至 2019 年期间在美国 19 个州进行的 24 项研究。其中 17 项研究筛查了 HIV,12 项研究筛查了 HCV,2 项研究筛查了 HBV。对于 HIV,72%的接触者被招募,64%的结果有效,4%的结果呈阳性,2%的结果得到告知,1%的结果被转介并接受了随访。其中,25%的阳性结果被转介接受治疗并开始治疗。对于 HCV,69%的接触者被招募,63%的结果有效,16%的结果呈阳性,14%的结果得到告知,3%的结果接受了随访。其中,30%的阳性结果被转介接受治疗,19%的结果开始治疗。在护理链的每个步骤的效果差异很大,具体取决于招募策略(例如,对于 HIV:71.6%的接触者在服务基础上被招募,而在医疗保健机构基础上和外展方面则没有效果)。
在接受 HIV 和 HCV 护理的人群中,很大一部分在随访步骤中丢失,从未接受过治疗。未来的项目应研究辍学原因,并采取干预措施,以减少这一人群中的健康差距。