Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;19(14):8646. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148646.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, N95 respirators were commonly used in many situations. Respiratory problems from prolonged use of respirators were discussed in many studies, which show varied results. From the inconclusive results, the current systematic review and meta-analysis discerned the effects of the N95 respirator by assessing the oxygen and carbon dioxide changes in both high- and low-to-moderate-intensity physical activities in a healthy population. Thirteen studies were identified for inclusion in the study. In high-intensity physical activities, our meta-analysis showed borderline lower oxygen saturation and higher carbon dioxide partial pressure, but oxygen saturation did not change in low-to-moderate physical activity. The use of N95 respirators could statistically affect the physiologic changes of carbon dioxide and oxygen in high-intensity physical activity among healthy participants, but this may not be clinically significant. Some users who have certain health conditions, such as respiratory problems, should be informed of the clinical symptoms related to hypercarbia and hypoxia for the early detection of adverse effects of N95 respirators.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,N95 呼吸器在许多情况下被广泛使用。许多研究都讨论了长时间使用呼吸器引起的呼吸问题,但结果各不相同。本系统评价和荟萃分析通过评估健康人群在高强度和中低强度体力活动中氧气和二氧化碳的变化,来确定 N95 呼吸器的效果。确定了 13 项研究纳入本研究。在高强度体力活动中,我们的荟萃分析显示氧饱和度略有降低,二氧化碳分压升高,但在中低强度体力活动中氧饱和度没有变化。N95 呼吸器的使用可能会在统计学上影响健康参与者高强度体力活动中二氧化碳和氧气的生理变化,但这可能没有临床意义。对于某些健康状况(如呼吸问题)的使用者,应告知与高碳酸血症和缺氧相关的临床症状,以便早期发现 N95 呼吸器的不良反应。