• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较研究垃圾焚烧厂 CH 排放因子开发的采样和测量方法。

Comparative Study of Sampling and Measurement Methods for the Development of CH Emission Factors at MSW Incinerators.

机构信息

Climate Change & Environment Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.

Department of Climate and Environment, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;19(14):8647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148647.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19148647
PMID:35886499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324669/
Abstract

Lung samplers (periodic sampling) have generally been used to develop CH emission factors in waste incineration facilities. Since this method must be calculated using only the value at a specific point in time, it may not reflect the emission characteristics depending on the circumstances of the facility. In order to supplement this method, a method of continuously collecting samples for a long period of time or continuously measuring may be used. In this study, the CH emission factor development and titration methodology were reviewed using both the existing methods and the newly proposed continuous sampling and continuous measurement methods. As a result of the analysis, the average emission factor by periodic sampling was 0.201 gCH/ton-waste, the average emission factor by continuous capture was 0.199 gCH/ton-waste, and the average emission factor by continuous measurement was 0.176 gCH/ton-waste. There was a difference of 0.025 gCH/ton-waste in the emission factor values by periodic sampling and continuous measurement, and the emission factor values for periodic sampling and continuous sampling were similar. There was no statistically significant difference, confirming that all three methods could be used. However, the existing method, periodic sampling, cannot reflect the characteristics of the night, and, in the case of continuous measurement, expensive equipment and maintenance are difficult. Therefore, it is judged that the method using continuous sampling is a good method that can combine the two advantages.

摘要

采用周期采样法的空气采样器,通常用于开发垃圾焚烧设施中的 CH 排放因子。由于这种方法只能使用特定时间点的值进行计算,因此可能无法反映设施情况的排放特征。为了补充这种方法,可以使用长时间连续采样或连续测量的方法。在本研究中,同时使用现有的方法和新提出的连续采样和连续测量方法,对 CH 排放因子开发和滴定方法进行了审查。分析结果表明,周期采样的平均排放因子为 0.201 gCH/吨废物,连续捕获的平均排放因子为 0.199 gCH/吨废物,连续测量的平均排放因子为 0.176 gCH/吨废物。周期采样和连续测量的排放因子值相差 0.025 gCH/吨废物,且周期采样和连续采样的排放因子值相似,没有统计学上的显著差异,证实这三种方法均可使用。但是,现有的周期采样法无法反映夜间的特征,而连续测量法则存在设备昂贵且维护困难的问题。因此,认为采用连续采样的方法是一种很好的方法,可以结合两种方法的优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/476252155709/ijerph-19-08647-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/4c58209939f5/ijerph-19-08647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/fc8c8a3de635/ijerph-19-08647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/fd128e53de32/ijerph-19-08647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/af1f2d2e9a64/ijerph-19-08647-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/476252155709/ijerph-19-08647-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/4c58209939f5/ijerph-19-08647-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/fc8c8a3de635/ijerph-19-08647-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/fd128e53de32/ijerph-19-08647-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/af1f2d2e9a64/ijerph-19-08647-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e89/9324669/476252155709/ijerph-19-08647-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Sampling and Measurement Methods for the Development of CH Emission Factors at MSW Incinerators.比较研究垃圾焚烧厂 CH 排放因子开发的采样和测量方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 15;19(14):8647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148647.
2
Emission of greenhouse gases from waste incineration in Korea.韩国垃圾焚烧产生的温室气体排放。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 1;196:710-718. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.071. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
The comparison of fossil carbon fraction and greenhouse gas emissions through an analysis of exhaust gases from urban solid waste incineration facilities.通过分析城市固体废物焚烧设施的废气来比较化石碳含量和温室气体排放。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Oct;66(10):978-87. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1192070.
4
The study on biomass fraction estimate methodology of municipal solid waste incinerator in Korea.韩国城市固体废弃物焚烧炉生物质比例估算方法的研究
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Oct;66(10):971-7. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1185479.
5
The estimation of N2O emissions from municipal solid waste incineration facilities: The Korea case.估算城市固体废物焚烧设施的 N2O 排放:韩国案例。
Waste Manag. 2011 Aug;31(8):1765-71. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
6
Development of municipal solid waste classification in Korea based on fossil carbon fraction.基于化石碳含量的韩国城市固体废弃物分类发展
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Oct;65(10):1256-60. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1079563.
7
Field measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from biological treatment facilities of food waste in Republic of Korea.韩国食品废物生物处理设施温室气体排放的现场测量。
Waste Manag Res. 2019 May;37(5):452-460. doi: 10.1177/0734242X18815956. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
8
Estimating the Characteristics and Emission Factor of Ammonia from Sewage Sludge Incinerator.估算污水污泥焚烧炉中氨的特性和排放因子。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052539.
9
Application of the Mahalanobis distance on evaluating the overall performance of moving-grate incineration of municipal solid waste.应用马氏距离评估城市生活垃圾移动炉排焚烧的整体性能。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Apr 15;190(5):284. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6653-z.
10
In-situ measurement of temperature and alkali metal concentration in municipal solid waste incinerators using flame emission spectroscopy.采用火焰发射光谱法对城市固体废物焚烧炉中的温度和堿金属浓度进行原位测量。
Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 1;102:486-491. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.015. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?非正态数据:方差分析仍然是一个有效的选择吗?
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):552-557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383.
2
Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit?方差比对方差分析稳健性的影响:1.5 可能是极限吗?
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):937-962. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2.
3
A comparison of CH, NO and CO emissions from three different cover types in a municipal solid waste landfill.城市固体废弃物填埋场中三种不同覆盖类型的CH、NO和CO排放对比。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2017 Apr;67(4):507-515. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1268547.
4
Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis.研究与数据分析中的基本统计工具。
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;60(9):662-669. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.190623.
5
Nitrous oxide and methane emissions and nitrous oxide isotopic composition from waste incineration in Switzerland.瑞士垃圾焚烧产生的一氧化二氮和甲烷排放以及一氧化二氮同位素组成
Waste Manag. 2015 Jan;35:135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
6
Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.用于统计分析的正态性检验:非统计学家指南。
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
7
The impact of incinerators on human health and environment.焚烧炉对人类健康和环境的影响。
Rev Environ Health. 2013;28(1):67-72. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2012-0035.
8
Development of methane and nitrous oxide emission factors for the biomass fired circulating fluidized bed combustion power plant.生物质循环流化床燃烧发电厂甲烷和一氧化二氮排放因子的开发。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:989242. doi: 10.1100/2012/989242. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
9
The MMT bag for emission source sampling: design and evaluation.用于排放源采样的MMT袋:设计与评估
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Jan;51(1):60-8. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464257.