Berkman L F
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1987;35(1):46-53.
Epidemiologists and other researchers in the biomedical field have recently recognized the potential importance of social networks and the support they provide in maintaining health and well being. However, measuring social networks and social support has not proven to be easy, measures are generally not well validated and critical dimensions or characteristics of networks have yet to be identified. The aim of this paper is to provide the reader with some background on the work being done in this area. In particular, attention is devoted to why, historically, social networks have been suspected of playing a role in disease causation, what some important characteristics of networks are likely to be, examples of measures currently in use, and what the biological pathways are that may link networks to morbidity and mortality. A description of the Alameda County Study in California is given. In this study, people who were socially isolated were found to be over twice as likely to die in a nine-year follow-up period as those with many contacts. This increased risk was found to be independent of alcohol and cigarette consumption, obesity and other health practices.
流行病学家和生物医学领域的其他研究人员最近认识到社交网络及其在维持健康和幸福方面所提供支持的潜在重要性。然而,事实证明,衡量社交网络和社会支持并非易事,相关测量方法通常未得到充分验证,网络的关键维度或特征尚未明确。本文旨在为读者提供该领域正在开展的工作的一些背景信息。特别要关注的是,从历史角度来看,为何社交网络被怀疑在疾病成因中发挥作用,网络可能具有的一些重要特征是什么,当前使用的测量方法示例,以及可能将网络与发病率和死亡率联系起来的生物学途径是什么。文中介绍了加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县的一项研究。在这项研究中,发现社交孤立的人在九年随访期内死亡的可能性是社交广泛者的两倍多。研究发现,这种风险增加与酒精和香烟消费、肥胖及其他健康行为无关。