Intelligent Platforms & Architecture Lab, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA.
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 8;22(14):5134. doi: 10.3390/s22145134.
Recent advances in techniques to improve indoor localization accuracy for personnel and asset tracking challenges has enabled wide-spread adoption within the retail, manufacturing, and health care industries. Most currently deployed systems use distance estimates from known reference locations to localize a person or asset using geometric lateration techniques. The distances are determined using one of many radio frequency (RF) based ranging techniques. Unfortunately, such techniques are susceptible to interference and multipath propagation caused by obstructions within buildings. Because range inaccuracies from known locations can directly lead to incorrect position estimates, these systems often require careful upfront deployment design to account for site-specific interference sources. However, the upfront system deployment requirements necessary to achieve high positioning accuracy with RF-based ranging systems makes the use of such systems impractical, particularly for structures constructed of challenging materials or dense configurations. In this paper, we evaluate and compare the accuracy and precision of alternative RF-based devices within a range of indoor spaces composed of different materials and sizes. These spaces range from large open areas such as gymnasiums to confined engineering labs of traditional buildings as well as training buildings at the local Fire Department Training Facility. Our goal is to identify the impact of alternative RF-based systems on localization accuracy and precision specifically for first responders that are called upon to traverse structures composed of different materials and configurations. Consequently, in this study we have specifically chosen spaces that are likely to be encountered by firefighters during building fires or emergency medical responses. Moreover, many of these indoor spaces can be considered hostile using RF-based ranging techniques. We built prototype wearable localization edge devices designed for first responders and characterize both ranging and localization accuracy and precision using alternative transceivers including Bluetooth Low Energy, 433 MHz, 915 MHz, and ultra-wide band. Our results show that in hostile environments, using ultra-wide band transceivers for localization consistently outperforms the alternatives in terms of precision and accuracy.
近年来,用于提高人员和资产跟踪挑战的室内定位精度的技术取得了进展,这使得这些技术在零售、制造和医疗保健行业得到了广泛应用。大多数当前部署的系统使用来自已知参考位置的距离估计值,使用几何定位技术来定位人员或资产。这些距离是使用许多射频 (RF) 测距技术之一确定的。不幸的是,此类技术容易受到建筑物内障碍物引起的干扰和多径传播的影响。由于来自已知位置的范围不准确会直接导致位置估计错误,因此这些系统通常需要仔细的前期部署设计来考虑特定于站点的干扰源。然而,基于 RF 的测距系统实现高精度所需的前期系统部署要求使得此类系统的使用不切实际,特别是对于由具有挑战性的材料或密集配置构建的结构。在本文中,我们评估和比较了不同室内空间中各种替代 RF 设备的精度和精度,这些空间的范围从大型开放区域(如体育馆)到传统建筑物的封闭工程实验室以及当地消防局培训设施的培训建筑物。我们的目标是确定替代基于 RF 的系统对定位精度和精度的影响,特别是对于需要穿越由不同材料和配置构成的结构的第一响应者。因此,在这项研究中,我们特别选择了消防员在建筑物火灾或紧急医疗响应期间可能遇到的空间。此外,许多这些室内空间都可以被认为是使用基于 RF 的测距技术的敌对环境。我们为第一响应者构建了原型可穿戴定位边缘设备,并使用包括蓝牙低能、433 MHz、915 MHz 和超宽带在内的替代收发器来表征测距和定位精度和精度。我们的结果表明,在敌对环境中,使用超宽带收发器进行定位在精度和准确性方面始终优于其他替代方案。