Gracanin Ana, Minchinton Todd E, Mikac Katarina M
Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong Australia, New South Wales, Australia.
Mamm Res. 2022;67(4):467-482. doi: 10.1007/s13364-022-00643-5. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
Camera trapping to study wildlife allows for data collection, without the need to capture animals. Traditionally, camera traps have been used to target larger terrestrial mammal species, though recently novel methods and adjustments in procedures have meant camera traps can be used to study small mammals. The selfie trap (a camera trapping method) may present robust sampling and ecological study of small mammals. This study aimed to evaluate the selfie trap method in terms of its ability to detect species and estimate population density. To address this aim, standard small mammal live trapping was undertaken, immediately followed by camera trapping using the selfie trap. Both methods were set to target the arboreal sugar glider () and semi-arboreal brown antechinus ( The more ground-dwelling bush rat ( was also live trapped and recorded on camera. Across four survey areas, the probability of detection for each of the three species was higher for selfie traps than for live trapping. Spatially explicit capture-recapture models showed that selfie traps were superior at estimating density for brown antechinus and sugar gliders, when compared to simulated live trapping data. Hit rates (number of videos per various time intervals) were correlated with abundance. When correlating various hit rate intervals with abundance, the use of 10-min hit rate was best for predicting sugar glider abundance (R = 0.94). The abundance of brown antechinus was estimated from selfie traps using a 24-h hit rate as a predictor (R = 0.85). For sugar gliders, the selfie trap can replace live trapping as individuals can be identified through their unique facial stripes and natural ear scars, and thus used in capture-recapture analysis. This method may be useful for monitoring the abundance of other small mammal species that can also be individually recognized from photographs.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13364-022-00643-5.
利用相机陷阱研究野生动物可实现数据收集,而无需捕获动物。传统上,相机陷阱用于针对较大的陆生哺乳动物物种,不过最近方法的创新和程序的调整意味着相机陷阱可用于研究小型哺乳动物。自拍陷阱(一种相机陷阱方法)可能为小型哺乳动物提供有力的抽样和生态研究。本研究旨在评估自拍陷阱方法在检测物种和估计种群密度方面的能力。为实现这一目标,首先进行了标准的小型哺乳动物活体诱捕,随后立即使用自拍陷阱进行相机诱捕。两种方法都旨在针对树栖的蜜袋鼯()和半树栖的褐袋鼬()。更多在地面活动的丛林鼠()也被活体诱捕并记录在相机中。在四个调查区域,自拍陷阱对这三个物种中每个物种的检测概率都高于活体诱捕。空间明确的捕获 - 重捕模型表明,与模拟的活体诱捕数据相比,自拍陷阱在估计褐袋鼬和蜜袋鼯的密度方面更具优势。命中率(不同时间间隔的视频数量)与丰度相关。当将不同的命中率间隔与丰度相关联时,使用10分钟命中率最能预测蜜袋鼯的丰度(R = 0.94)。褐袋鼬的丰度通过将24小时命中率作为预测指标从自拍陷阱中估计得出(R = 0.85)。对于蜜袋鼯,自拍陷阱可以替代活体诱捕,因为个体可以通过其独特的面部条纹和天然耳部疤痕进行识别,从而用于捕获 - 重捕分析。这种方法可能有助于监测其他也可从照片中单独识别的小型哺乳动物物种的丰度。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13364 - 022 - 00643 - 5获取的补充材料。