• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家医疗服务体系改革能否克服新自由主义遗留问题?

Can ENGLAND'S National Health System Reforms Overcome the Neoliberal Legacy?

机构信息

Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2022 Oct;52(4):480-491. doi: 10.1177/00207314221115945. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1177/00207314221115945
PMID:35892154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9449431/
Abstract

England's National Health Service (NHS) is in the process of major reform as old institutional structures based around an internal "market" are being replaced with integrated care systems. The changes represent a significant shift in ethos away from commercialisation to collaboration between health providers. But the way that these policies unfold will depend on the context within which they are implemented, and three decades of neoliberal reforms have left their mark on the structure of the health system. This paper shows how a powerful, politically-connected financialised private sector has evolved alongside a weakened public system, depleted further by the pandemic. While the share of overall public health spending reaching the private sector has not increased greatly over the past decade, private financial investors are strongly embedded in some segments of health delivery, particularly mental health services where shareholder returns are boosted by financial engineering. The boundaries between private and public are increasingly blurred with the NHS treating private patients and self-payment for health services is increasingly normalised. Rather than traditional privatisation, the health system is facing a more subtle and pernicious erosion of public services across different dimensions which seems likely to continue despite the new reforms.

摘要

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)正在进行重大改革,旧有的内部“市场”为基础的机构结构正被整合的医疗系统所取代。这些变化代表着从商业化向医疗服务提供者之间的合作转变的重大转变。但这些政策的实施方式将取决于实施它们的背景,三十年来的新自由主义改革已经对医疗体系的结构产生了影响。本文展示了一个强大的、与政治有联系的金融化私营部门是如何与一个较弱的公共系统一起发展的,而这场大流行病又进一步削弱了公共系统。尽管过去十年中公共卫生支出中流向私营部门的比例并没有大幅增加,但私人金融投资者在一些医疗服务领域,特别是在通过金融工程提高股东回报的精神健康服务领域,已经深深扎根。随着 NHS 为私人患者提供治疗,以及自费医疗服务越来越普遍,公私之间的界限越来越模糊。与传统的私有化不同,医疗系统正面临着不同层面上的公共服务更微妙和更有害的侵蚀,尽管有新的改革,但这种侵蚀似乎仍将继续。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/486502e64d8f/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/095c4e174624/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/cd8f1d4f57fa/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/486502e64d8f/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/095c4e174624/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/cd8f1d4f57fa/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b33/9449431/486502e64d8f/10.1177_00207314221115945-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Can ENGLAND'S National Health System Reforms Overcome the Neoliberal Legacy?英国国家医疗服务体系改革能否克服新自由主义遗留问题?
Int J Health Serv. 2022 Oct;52(4):480-491. doi: 10.1177/00207314221115945. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
2
Change of government: one more big bang health care reform in England's National Health Service.政府更迭:英国国民保健制度迎来又一次重大医改。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(1):159-74. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.1.k.
3
When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act.市场化为何会导致私有化?2012 年《健康与社会保健法案》后的英国卫生服务中的营利行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;124:215-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.045. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Cross-sector collaboration to reduce health inequalities: a qualitative study of local collaboration between health care, social services, and other sectors under health system reforms in England.跨部门合作减少健康不平等:英格兰卫生系统改革下医疗保健、社会服务和其他部门之间地方合作的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2613. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20089-5.
5
In defiance of the evidence: conservatives threaten to "reform" away England's National Health Service.无视证据:保守党威胁要“改革”掉英国国民保健制度。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(1):137-55. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.1l.
6
Market reforms and public incentives: finding a balance in the Republic of Macedonia.市场改革与公共激励措施:在马其顿共和国寻求平衡
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Mar;54(6):939-53. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00067-3.
7
Mechanisms behind privatization: a case study of private growth in Swedish elderly care.私有化背后的机制:瑞典老年护理领域私营化发展的案例研究
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Mar;68(5):903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Jan 10.
8
The role of private non-profit healthcare organizations in NHS systems: Implications for the Portuguese hospital devolution program.私立非营利性医疗组织在国民医疗服务体系中的作用:对葡萄牙医院权力下放计划的启示。
Health Policy. 2017 Jun;121(6):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
9
Commentary: The Boy Who Cried Wolf or Cassandra? A Consideration of the Correct Characterization of Critics of Neoliberal Reforms to the English NHS.评论:那个喊“狼来了”的男孩还是卡珊德拉?对英国国民医疗服务体系新自由主义改革批评者正确定性的思考
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2023 Apr;53(2):239-242. doi: 10.1177/27551938221148370. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
10
Rethinking the private-public mix in health care: analysis of health reforms in Israel during the last three decades.重新审视医疗保健中的公私合作模式:对以色列过去三十年医疗改革的分析
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Oct;21(4):249-56. doi: 10.1177/1355819616650470. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic Strategies to Prevent Nonbeneficial Treatments Near the End of Life.预防临终时无效治疗的系统策略
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519771. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19771.
2
Algorithmic emergence? Epistemic in/justice in AI-directed transformations of healthcare.算法的出现?人工智能驱动的医疗保健变革中的认知不公正。
Front Sociol. 2025 Feb 7;10:1520810. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1520810. eCollection 2025.
3
Data-driven research and healthcare: public trust, data governance and the NHS.数据驱动的研究与医疗保健:公众信任、数据治理与英国国民保健制度。

本文引用的文献

1
The delivery plan for tackling the covid-19 backlog of elective care falls short.应对新冠疫情导致的择期护理积压问题的交付计划存在不足。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 19;377:o995. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o995.
2
England's new health and care bill.英国新的《健康与护理法案》。
BMJ. 2021 Jul 13;374:n1767. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1767.
3
Subsidiary of US healthcare firm will run more than 50 GP practices after takeover deal.美国医疗保健公司的子公司在收购交易后将运营50多家全科医生诊所。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 14;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00922-z.
BMJ. 2021 Feb 22;372:n519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n519.
4
Mortality in the USA, the UK and Other Western Countries, 1989-2015: What Is Wrong With the US?1989-2015 年美国、英国和其他西方国家的死亡率:美国出了什么问题?
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jan;51(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/0020731420965130. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
The Consequences of Neoliberalism in the Current Pandemic.当前大流行病中,新自由主义的后果。
Int J Health Serv. 2020 Jul;50(3):271-275. doi: 10.1177/0020731420925449. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Political Economy of Reform under US Federalism: Adopting Single-Payer Health Coverage in New York State.美国联邦制下的改革政治经济学:在纽约州采用单一支付者医疗覆盖。
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):209-223. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1635414. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation.卫生政策实施的政治分析。
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(3):224-235. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1625251. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
Neo-Liberalism, Austerity and the Political Determinants of Health.新自由主义、紧缩政策与健康的政治决定因素
Health Care Anal. 2019 Sep;27(3):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00377-7.
9
Globalisation and neoliberalism as structural drivers of health inequities.全球化和新自由主义是健康不平等的结构性驱动因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Oct 9;16(Suppl 1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0365-2.
10
More Reform of the English National Health Service: From Competition Back to Planning?英国国民医疗服务体系的更多改革:从竞争回归规划?
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jan;49(1):5-16. doi: 10.1177/0020731418797977. Epub 2018 Sep 6.