• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量诊断试验的比较:I型错误、检验效能和样本量。

Comparison of quantitative diagnostic tests: type I error, power, and sample size.

作者信息

Linnet K

出版信息

Stat Med. 1987 Mar;6(2):147-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060207.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780060207
PMID:3589244
Abstract

For a quantitative laboratory test the 0.975 fractile of the distribution of reference values is commonly used as a discrimination limit, and the sensitivity of the test is the proportion of diseased subjects with values exceeding this limit. A comparison of the estimates of sensitivity between two tests without taking into account the sampling variation of the discrimination limits can increase the type I error to about seven times the nominal value of 0.05. Correct statistical procedures are considered, and the power and required sample size are studied for Gaussian and log-Gaussian distributions of diagnostic test values. The results may be useful for the planning phase of studies to evaluate quantitative diagnostic tests.

摘要

对于定量实验室检测,参考值分布的0.975分位数通常用作判别限,检测的灵敏度是值超过该限的患病受试者的比例。在不考虑判别限抽样变异的情况下比较两种检测的灵敏度估计值,可能会使I型错误增加到约为名义值0.05的七倍。文中考虑了正确的统计程序,并针对诊断检测值的高斯分布和对数高斯分布研究了检验效能和所需样本量。这些结果可能对评估定量诊断检测的研究规划阶段有用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of quantitative diagnostic tests: type I error, power, and sample size.定量诊断试验的比较:I型错误、检验效能和样本量。
Stat Med. 1987 Mar;6(2):147-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060207.
2
Precision of sensitivity estimations in diagnostic test evaluations. Power functions for comparisons of sensitivities of two tests.
Clin Chem. 1985 Apr;31(4):574-80.
3
Impact of subgroup prevalences on partitioning of Gaussian-distributed reference values.亚组患病率对高斯分布参考值划分的影响。
Clin Chem. 2002 Nov;48(11):1987-99.
4
Statistical treatment of reference values in laboratory medicine: testing the goodness-of-fit of an observed distribution to the Gaussian distribution.检验医学中参考值的统计学处理:检验观察分布与高斯分布的拟合优度。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1986;184:125-32.
5
Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.不一致率,一个将诊断决策与分析性能特征相结合的新概念。1. 在方法或样本系统比较以及确定决策限中的应用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):347-55. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.055.
6
Current concepts of "normal values," "reference values," and "discrimination values," in clinical chemistry.
Clin Chem. 1975 Dec;21(13):1873-7.
7
Statistical aspects of the estimation of reference limits.
Sci Total Environ. 1992 Jun 9;120(1-2):155-71. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(92)90228-k.
8
Confidence intervals of reference limits in small reference sample groups.小参考样本组中参考限值的置信区间。
Vet Clin Pathol. 2013 Sep;42(3):395-8. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12065. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
9
Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.Box-Cox变换对Haseman-Elston检验及最大似然方差成分检验检测数量性状基因座效能的影响。
Hum Hered. 2003;55(2-3):108-16. doi: 10.1159/000072315.
10
Tests for an upper percentile of a lognormal distribution based on samples with multiple detection limits and sample-size calculation.基于具有多个检测限的样本对对数正态分布的较高百分位数进行的检验及样本量计算。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Nov;57(9):1200-12. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/met037. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Sensitivity Maximization at a Given Specificity Method for Binary Classifications.一种用于二元分类的给定特异性下的新型灵敏度最大化方法。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Mar 3;18(3):117-123. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0236.
2
A Dunnett-Type Test and Its Sample Size Calculation for Comparing ROC Curves with a Control.一种用于将ROC曲线与对照进行比较的Dunnett型检验及其样本量计算
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;14(16):1813. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161813.
3
A novel estimator for the two-way partial AUC.双向部分 AUC 的一种新估计量。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 20;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02382-2.
4
Interval estimation for operating characteristic of continuous biomarkers with controlled sensitivity or specificity.具有可控灵敏度或特异性的连续生物标志物操作特征的区间估计。
Stat Sin. 2023 Jan;33(1):193-214. doi: 10.5705/ss.202021.0020.
5
An Elaboration on Sample Size Planning for Performing a One-Sample Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis by Basing on Calculations on a Specified 95% Confidence Interval Width.基于指定的95%置信区间宽度计算进行单样本灵敏度和特异性分析的样本量规划详述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 11;13(8):1390. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13081390.
6
Augmented Whole-Body Scanning via Magnifying PET.基于正电子发射断层扫描的全身放大扫描技术
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Nov;39(11):3268-3277. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2962623. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
A second-generation virtual-pinhole PET device for enhancing contrast recovery and improving lesion detectability of a whole-body PET/CT scanner.一种第二代虚拟针孔 PET 设备,用于提高全身 PET/CT 扫描仪的对比度恢复和改善病灶探测能力。
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):4165-4176. doi: 10.1002/mp.13724. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
8
The Impact of Data Dependence on Speaker Recognition Evaluation.数据依赖性对说话人识别评估的影响。
IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2017 Jan;25(1):5-18. doi: 10.1109/TASLP.2016.2614725. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
9
Development of an activity disease score in patients with uveitis (UVEDAI).葡萄膜炎患者活动疾病评分(UVEDAI)的制定
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Apr;37(4):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3593-1. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Validation of Nonparametric Two-Sample Bootstrap in ROC Analysis on Large Datasets.大型数据集ROC分析中基于非参数双样本自助法的验证
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2016;45(5):1689-1703. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2015.1065327. Epub 2015 Aug 31.