• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Dunnett-Type Test and Its Sample Size Calculation for Comparing ROC Curves with a Control.一种用于将ROC曲线与对照进行比较的Dunnett型检验及其样本量计算
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;14(16):1813. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161813.
2
Sample size calculation for comparing two ROC curves.比较两条 ROC 曲线的样本量计算。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Jul-Aug;23(4):557-569. doi: 10.1002/pst.2371. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Sample size recalculation in sequential diagnostic trials.序贯诊断试验中的样本量重算。
Biostatistics. 2010 Jan;11(1):151-63. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp044. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
5
A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.小样本量连续诊断试验中ROC曲线下面积的置信/可信区间方法比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2603-2621. doi: 10.1177/0962280215602040. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
6
Robust estimation of area under ROC curve using auxiliary variables in the presence of missing biomarker values.在存在生物标志物值缺失的情况下使用辅助变量对ROC曲线下面积进行稳健估计。
Biometrics. 2011 Jun;67(2):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01487.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
7
Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.安大略省乳糜泻血清学检测的临床效用:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(21):1-111. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
8
Bayesian modeling and inference for diagnostic accuracy and probability of disease based on multiple diagnostic biomarkers with and without a perfect reference standard.基于有无完美参考标准的多种诊断生物标志物的疾病诊断准确性和概率的贝叶斯建模与推断。
Stat Med. 2016 Mar 15;35(6):859-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.6745. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.一种对面积差异敏感的置换检验,用于比较配对设计的ROC曲线。
Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2873-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.2149.
10
Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers to assess lung consolidation in calves with induced bacterial pneumonia using receiver operating characteristic curves.应用受试者工作特征曲线评估生物标志物对人工诱导细菌性肺炎牛肺部实变的诊断准确性。
J Anim Sci. 2022 Jan 1;100(1). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab368.

本文引用的文献

1
Sample size calculation for comparing two ROC curves.比较两条 ROC 曲线的样本量计算。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Jul-Aug;23(4):557-569. doi: 10.1002/pst.2371. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
2
Sample size determination for comparing accuracies between two diagnostic tests under a paired design.配对设计两种诊断试验准确性比较的样本量估计。
Biom J. 2022 Apr;64(4):771-804. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202000036. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
3
The evaluation of diagnostic tests.诊断试验的评估
Biometrics. 1950 Dec;6(4):399-412.
4
Sample size calculation for rank tests comparing K survival distributions.比较K个生存分布的秩检验的样本量计算。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2002 Dec;8(4):361-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1020518905233.
5
Comparison of diagnostic markers with repeated measurements: a non-parametric ROC curve approach.具有重复测量的诊断标志物比较:一种非参数ROC曲线方法。
Stat Med. 2000 Feb 29;19(4):511-23. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<511::aid-sim353>3.0.co;2-3.
6
A statistic for comparing two correlated markers which are prognostic for time to an event.一种用于比较两个对事件发生时间具有预后价值的相关标志物的统计量。
Stat Med. 1995 Oct 30;14(20):2217-25. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780142005.
7
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的意义及应用。
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747.
8
A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.一种比较源自相同病例的受试者工作特征曲线下面积的方法。
Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708.
9
Comparing the areas under more than two independent ROC curves.比较两条以上独立ROC曲线下的面积。
Med Decis Making. 1987 Jul-Sep;7(3):149-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8700700305.
10
Comparison of quantitative diagnostic tests: type I error, power, and sample size.定量诊断试验的比较:I型错误、检验效能和样本量。
Stat Med. 1987 Mar;6(2):147-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060207.

一种用于将ROC曲线与对照进行比较的Dunnett型检验及其样本量计算

A Dunnett-Type Test and Its Sample Size Calculation for Comparing ROC Curves with a Control.

作者信息

Jung Sin-Ho

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 20;14(16):1813. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161813.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14161813
PMID:39202301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353566/
Abstract

Diagnostic biomarkers are key components of diagnostics. In this paper, we consider diagnostic biomarkers taking continuous values that are associated with a dichotomous disease status, called malignant or benign. The performance of such a biomarker is evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of its receiver operating characteristic curve. We assume that, together with the disease status, one control and multiple experimental biomarkers are collected from each subject to test if any of the experimental biomarkers have a larger AUC than the control. In this case, each experimental biomarker will be compared with the control so that a multiple testing issue is involved in the comparisons. In this paper, we propose a simple non-parametric statistical testing procedure to compare K(≥2) experimental biomarkers with a control, adjusting for the multiplicity and its sample size calculation method. Our sample size formula requires the specification of the AUC values (or the standardized effect size of each biomarker between the benign and malignant groups) together with the correlation coefficients between the biomarkers, the prevalence of the malignant group in the study population, the type I error rate, and the power. Through simulations, we show that the statistical test controls the overall type I error rate accurately and the proposed sample size closely maintains the specified statistical power.

摘要

诊断生物标志物是诊断的关键组成部分。在本文中,我们考虑取值为连续型且与二分疾病状态(称为恶性或良性)相关的诊断生物标志物。此类生物标志物的性能通过其接收者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)来评估。我们假设,除了疾病状态外,还从每个受试者收集了一个对照生物标志物和多个实验生物标志物,以检验是否有任何实验生物标志物的AUC大于对照生物标志物。在这种情况下,每个实验生物标志物都将与对照进行比较,因此在比较中涉及多重检验问题。在本文中,我们提出了一种简单的非参数统计检验程序,用于将K(≥2)个实验生物标志物与一个对照进行比较,并对多重性及其样本量计算方法进行调整。我们的样本量公式需要指定AUC值(或良性和恶性组之间每个生物标志物的标准化效应大小),以及生物标志物之间的相关系数、研究人群中恶性组的患病率、I型错误率和检验效能。通过模拟,我们表明该统计检验能够准确控制总体I型错误率,并且所提出的样本量能紧密维持指定的统计检验效能。