Mocci Giammarco, Bodini Giorgia, Allegretta Leonardo, Cazzato Alessia Immacolata, Chiri Stefania, Aragona Giovanni, Perazzo Patrizia, Ferronato Antonio, Graziani Maria Giovanna, Pagnini Cristiano, Zampaletta Costantino, Graziosi Camilla, Picchio Marcello, Elisei Walter, Maconi Giovanni, Tursi Antonio
Division of Gastroenterology, "Brotzu" Hospital, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS "San Martino" Hospital, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Biomedicines. 2022 Jul 26;10(8):1799. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081799.
The approval of adalimumab (ADA) biosimilars for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has reduced the cost of treatment. While several ADA biosimilars are currently available, comparative data on the ADA biosimilar GP2017 (Hyrimoz) and its originator (Humira) in IBD are lacking. We compared the efficacy and safety of GP2017 versus originator in IBD outpatients in an Italian real-life setting. This retrospective analysis enrolled consecutive IBD patients with complete clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data. Clinical activity was assessed with the Mayo score in ulcerative colitis (UC) and the Harvey-Bradshaw Index in Crohn's disease (CD). The primary endpoints were the induction of remission and the safety of GP2017 versus ADA originator. One hundred and thirty-four patients (30.6% with UC and 69.4% with CD, median age 38 years) were enrolled: 62 (46.3%) patients were treated with GP2017, and 72 (53.7%) with ADA originator; 118 (88.1%) patients were naïve to ADA. Clinical remission was obtained in 105 (78.4%) patients, during a median follow-up of 12 months, 82.3% and 75% in the GP2017 and ADA originator groups, respectively ( = 0.311). Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. This analysis of real-world data suggests that GP2017 and its originator are equivalent in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with IBD.
阿达木单抗(ADA)生物类似药获批用于治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)降低了治疗成本。虽然目前有几种ADA生物类似药可供使用,但缺乏关于ADA生物类似药GP2017(Hyrimoz)及其原研药(修美乐)在IBD方面的比较数据。我们在意大利的实际临床环境中比较了GP2017与原研药在IBD门诊患者中的疗效和安全性。这项回顾性分析纳入了具有完整临床、实验室和内镜检查数据的连续性IBD患者。采用梅奥评分评估溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的临床活动度,采用哈维-布拉德肖指数评估克罗恩病(CD)的临床活动度。主要终点是诱导缓解以及GP2017与ADA原研药的安全性。共纳入134例患者(30.6%为UC患者,69.4%为CD患者,中位年龄38岁):62例(46.3%)患者接受GP2017治疗,72例(53.7%)患者接受ADA原研药治疗;118例(88.1%)患者既往未使用过ADA。在中位随访12个月期间,105例(78.4%)患者实现临床缓解,GP2017组和ADA原研药组分别为82.3%和75%(P = 0.311)。两组治疗耐受性均良好。这项对真实世界数据的分析表明,在IBD患者中,GP2017及其原研药在疗效和安全性方面相当。